VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Iqbal v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
4 July 2013
Bench
Hima Kohliauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 963/2013

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Hima Kohli

Judgment

ORDER o/o

04.07.2013

¶1Vide order dated 30.05.2013, the present applications filed by the petitionersunder Section 438 read with Section 482 of the Cr.PC for anticipatorybail in FIR No.143/2013lodged under Section 380 IPG at Police Station: Kanjhawala,were taken up for considerationand in view of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioners that BAIL APPLN. 963/2013 and 979/2013 Page 1 of2 when the complainanthad called up in the morning of the incident, they were in Meerut, UP, which could be verified from the CDR of the mobile phones, counsel for the petitioners had prayed for grant of anticipatorybail. The Court had perused the status report filed by the State and after examiningthe same, the petitionerswere directed to join investigationas and when requiredby the SHO/IO concerned.

¶2Learned Addl. PP Informsthe Court that the petitionershad duly joined the investigation and the verification of the CDR of the petitioners' mobile phones confirms their submission that in the morning of the incidentof theft,they were in Meerut, UP.

¶3In view of the aforesaidsubmission,the presentapplicationsare disposed of with directionsthat in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be releasedon bail, subjectto theirfurnishinga personalbond in the sum of ?20,000/- each with one local surety each in the like amount,to the satisfactionof the investigatingofficer/arrestingofficer. Needless to state that the petitioners shall fully co-operate m the investigationand will not create any hindranceor impediment during the course of investigation. DASTL HIMA KOHLI, J JULY 04, 2013 Sl APPLN. 963/2013and979/2013 2of2

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 963/2013 IQBAL Petitioner Through: Mr. Devender Hora, Advocate versus Respondent Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Addl. PP with SI Arun, PS: Kanjhawala. + BAIL APPLN. 979/2013 SALIM Petitioner Through: Mr. Devender Hora, Advocate versus Respondent Through: Mr. Naveen Sharnna, Addl. PP with SI Arun, PS: Kanjhawala. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.