Sunil Tyagi & Ors v. State(Nct of Delhi)& Others

ORDER Vo

11.L1.2011 Both these petitions have been filed under section 482 Cr. P.C. for quashing of FIR No. t79t20rti, p.s. Mehrauri u/s 4271323134115061354134 IPC and FIR No. 358/2010, p.S. Mehrauli U/s 32314521506/35415091t4711.481149134 IPC respectively. These are Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. t't ) i cross cases by both the parties against each other. Both these cases arise out of the same transaction. Petitioners and respondents are present in person. Petitioners of both the petitions have been identified by the lo. lt is stated that complainants have compromised and settled their respective complaint against each other amicably and out of their own free will. All the parties are neighbour and live in the same locality. In view of the fact that parties have compromiseftheir respective complaints, they are neighour and live in the same locality, no useful purpose will be servg(by continuing with the FIR cases against each other. Hence, FIR No. L7812010, p.S. Mehrauli U/s 4271323134L15061354134 IPC and FtR No. 358/2010, p.S. Mehrauti U/s 32314521506135415091147 lL48lI4gl34 IPC and all proceedings arisihg there from are hereby quashed. The petitions stand disposed of. NOVEMBER LL,?OLL awanish M.L. MEHTA,J ',

h s-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cRL.M .C. L554120r1 SUNIL TYAGI & ORS ..... petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar, Adv. VETSUS STATE(NCT OF DELHI)& OTHERS ..... Respondent Through Ms Fizani Husain, APP with ASI Krishan Kumar 7 $-28 + CRL.M.C. 1599/2011 UMESH KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Girish Sharma, Adv. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms Fizani Husain, App CORAM: E HoN'BLE MR. JUsrtcE M.L. MEHTA