VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Abhinand Agro Pvt. Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2011
Bench
Manmohanauthor
Case no.
CO.PET. 218/2011

Judgment

ORDER % 11.11.2011

¶1This second motion joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 & 394; 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Act') seeking sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement (for short 'Scheme') for (a) Amalgamation of Abhinand Agro Pvt Ltd. ('Transferor Company') with TPS Infrastructure Ltd. ('Transferee Company'); and (b) Re-arrangement/Reduction of post merger share capital of the Transferee Company. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Petitioner Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital hav been given in the Petition. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 3 I' t March, 2010 Provisional Accounts for the period ended 15th December, 2010 of Petitioner Companies have also been enclosed with the Petition. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme have also been placed record. It has been submitted that no proceeding under sections 235 to 21 of the Act is pending against the Petitioner Companies. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) 47 of 2011 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of meetings Vide order dated 7th March, 2011, this Court allowed the Application requirements of convening meetings of the Equity Shareholders and U-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company and the Equity Shareho and Preference Shareholders of the Transferee Company were dispens 91, with. The Transferor Company did not have any Secured Creditors. H This Court further directed convening of separate meetings of Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company under its supervision for the purpose of considering and approving the proposed Scheme. It is stated that separate meetings of Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company were duly convened and held on Saturday, 23 k' April, 2011 at 3.00 P.M. and 4.00 P.M. respectively conference Hall, Rajendra Bhawan, 210, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg, N Delhi-i 10 002 and the Scheme was approved unanimously, in the meetings held under the supervision of this Court without any modificatioi The respective Chairpersons have already reported the result of the aforesai meetings to the Court by way of their Reports. The Petitioner Companies had thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction to the Sqheme. Vide order dated 6th May, 2011, notice of

the Petition was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator attached with this Court. Citations were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English Edition) and 'Jansatta (Hindi Edition). Affidavit of Service and Publication has been fi1ed by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding service of the Petition on the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, and also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 18th October, 2011. Copies of the newspapers' cuttings, in original, containing the publications have also been filed along with the Affidavit of Service. Pursuant to the notice issued, the Official Liquidator sought information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information received, the Official Liquidator has filed his report on 1 1th October, 201 1, wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the proposed Scheme from any person/party interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the Transferor Company, which is a subject matter of dissolution, do not appear to have been conducted in a mannef prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or to public interest. In response to the notice issued in the Petition, IVfr. B K Bansal, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit dated 131h October, 2011. Relying on the Scheme, he has stated that all the employees of the Transferor Company shall become the employees of the Transferee Company without any break or interruption in their services upon sanctioning of the Scheme by the Court. No objection has been received to the Scheme from any other party. Mr Virendra Oberoi, Managing Director of the Transferee Company has filed an affidavit confirming that neither the Petitioner Companies nor their Counsel has received any objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers. Even today, during the course of hearing, neither Mr. Raj iv Bah, learned counsel for the Official Liquidator nor Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies appearing for Regional Director (NR) have raised • any objection to the present Scheme being sanctioned by the Court. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and Creditor of the Petitioner Companies; affidavit/report filed by the Regional Di Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, attached with this Court to proposed Scheme, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sancti to the Scheme. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the under Sections 391 and 394; 100 to 104 of the Act. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of the formal order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within thirty days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of Sections 391 and 394; 100 to 104 of the Act, all th properties, rights and powers of the Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further act or deed Similarly, all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into effect, the Transferor Company shall stand dissolved without winding up. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty dr any other charges, if payable, in accordance with any law; or permissionlcompliance with any other requirement which may b? specifically required under any law. The Petitioner Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Ri 1,00,000/- with the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator withi three weeks from today. The said statement is accepted. The Petition is allowed in the above terms. Order Dasti. MANMOIIAN,Y NOVEMBER 11 9 2011 m NG I

Case details

Parties and counsel

$, * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 218/2011 In the matter of ABHINAND AGRO PVT. LTD Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Goel, Adv. for petitioner companies Mr. Rajiv Bahi, Adv. for Official Liquidator Mr. K.S. Pradhan, DY.ROC for RD (NR) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.