- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 February 2008
- Bench
- Joint Registrar Sh. Prem Kumar Barthwal
- Case no.
- TEST.CAS. 58/2006
Judgment
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on : February 12, 2008 Pronounced on : February 15, 2008 SMT. KRISHNA TEWARI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.C.S.Yadav with Mr.Pratyosh K.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.D.P.Mishra, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
¶1Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
¶2To be referred to the Reporter or not?
¶3Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
¶1This is a petition filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 for grant of Probate concerning the will and testment dated 4 th May 2002 if Late Shri Narendra Kumar Tiwari hereafter referred to the "Testator'. 1 of 4
¶2The Petitioner submits that the Testator died living behind four legal heirs namely; Ms. Krishna Tiwari, the (wife of the Testator); Ms. Anumeeta Gupta (daughter); Mr. Anupam Tiwari (Son) and Ms. Vandita Tiwari (daugher). It is averred in the petition that a testator who died on 13 th November, 2002 at New Delhi executed his last will and testament on 4 th May 2002 and appointed his wife, the present petitioner, as the executrix for the said will in relation all movable and immovable properties left by him.
¶3The petitioner avers that the Will was executed in the presence of Sh. Suneel Sharma R/o 1179, Sector A Pocket B, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and Sh. Shailesh Dayal R/o 20/124, 2 nd Floor, Vikram Vihar, Lajpat Nagar –IV, New Delhi – 110 024; they attested it in the presence of each other. Further it is averred that under the said Will all movable and immovable properties belonging to the testator have been bequeathed to the petitioner. Details of these properties have been enlisted in Schedule A to the petition and are as follows: IMMOVABLE ASSETS
¶1SFA DDA Flat bearing No. D2-2008, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi LIST OF MOVABLE ASSETS
¶1Shares of M/s Unitech – 450 in number 2 of 4
¶2Shares of M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., -21 in number
¶3Shares of M/s. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd., - 150 in number
¶4Shares of M/s. JBF Industries Ltd., - 100 in number
¶5Shares of M/s. Reliance Natural Resources Ltd., - 50 in number
¶6Shares of M/s. Reliance Communication Venture Ltd., - 50 in number
¶7Shares of M/s. Pasupati Acrylon Ltd., -237 in number
¶4The other three legal heirs have filed affidavits recording their no objection to the grant of Probate of all movable and immovable properties to the petitioner. Pursuant to the direction of the Court notice to the public at large was published in the news paper "The Statesman", Delhi Edition on 12 th November 2006 and the same has been placed on record. The other legal heirs also appeared in Court through their counsel Mr. Awanish Sinha and reiterated the no objection affidavit filed them. The petitioner has filed the original copy of the Will (Exhibit PW 1/2) as well as the Death Certificate of the Testator. The affidavits of the attesting witnesses are on record. Both have also deposed as PW-2 and PW-3 about the testator signing the Will; in their presence and their attesting it at that time.
¶5From the above discussion it is clear that the will made by Shri Narender Kumar Tiwari whereby he bequeathed all movable and immovable properties listed above in 3 of 4 favour of his wife the present petitioner, has been duly proved. It is also clear that the other relations of the Testator have no objection to the grant of Probate to the Petitioner, appointed by the Testator as the Executor of the Will.
¶6In the light of the above I accept the Will (Exhibit PW1/2) executed Shri. Narender Kumar Tiwari and grant Probate of the same to the petitioner, subject to valuation report, and payment of the necessary Court fee. The petitioner shall also ex ecute administration bond and surety bond.
¶7The petition is allowed in the above terms. S. RAVINDRA BHAT JUDGE FEBRUARY 15, 2008 4 of 4
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.