VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Ltd v. Trendy Bake Private Limited

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
20 August 2026
Bench
Jyoti Singhauthor
Case no.
CS(COMM) 949/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

20.08.2026

¶1This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant and all others acting on its behalf from manufacturing, exporting, selling, offering for sale, exhibiting, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing with goods being all kinds of Gourmet Breads, Institutional Breads including white breads, Atta Breads, Milk Breads, Bun Breads, Sandwich Bread, Milk Breads, Multi Grain Breads, Garlic Breads, White Breads, Fruit Breads, Sourdough Breads, Focaccia Breads, Pav Breads, Buns including burger buns, center filled buns, Fruit Buns, Bun fills Burger, Rusks, Cakes Pizza Base etc., or other cognate and allied goods under the trade mark/label/packaging ENGLISH The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

BAKE/

or any other identical/deceptively similar mark to the Plaintiffs registered trade mark/label amounting to infringement of the registered trade mark/label/ENGLISH OVEN under No. 2904348 in Class 30, under no 3013157 in Class 30, under no. 1283635 in Class 30 under No. 6099834 in Class 30, under No. 609983 in Class 30 under No. 6097978 in Class 30, under No. 6097977 in Class 30 under No. 6097980 in Class 30 etc., of the Plaintiff, amounting to infringement of Plaintiff's copyright. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶2During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably settled their inter se disputes and executed and signed a Settlement Agreement dated 18.08.2026, incorporating the terms of settlement. Copy of the Settlement Agreement is handed over in Court and is taken on record.

¶3Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Terms of settlement are incorporated in paragraph 8 of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement. Settlement agreement shall form a part of decree sheet and shall bind the parties.

¶4Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet.

¶5Suit along with pending applications stands disposed of.

¶6Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870.

JYOTI SINGH, J AUGUST 20, 2026/AK

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010661972025 + CS(COMM) 949/2025 & I.A. 22107/2025 MRS. BECTORS FOOD SPECIALITIES LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Mr. Vikrant Malhotra and Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocates. versus TRENDY BAKE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.