Rohit Soni v. State

ORDER %

08.11.2011 This is an application under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail moved on behalf of the petitioner who is involved in a case under Section 419/420/406/468/471/120B IPC registered with police station Preet Vihar. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the status report filed by the police. There are serious allegations against the petitioner of having impersonated himself in the name of Amit Sharma and persuaded the complainant to deliver the goods worth more than Rs.lO lac on two occasions. He also delivered one cheque, which on verification came to be known that the account was closed before delivery of the goods by the complainant. The photographs on Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. •> / the account opening form were also found to be of some different person than the petitioner. On verification, it was found that the photographs on the account-opening form was not that of Amit Sharma but of the petitioner. The Pan card in the name of Amit Sharma submitted with account opening form was also having photograph of the petitioner and same mobile phone number was provided in the account opening forms in the name of Amit Sharma and petitioners. There are serious allegations of impersonation against the petitioner. I am not inclined to admit the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The application for anticipatory bail is hereby dismissed. M.L. MEHTAJ NOVEMBER 08, 2011 rd

M, 5/ $-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Bail Appln. 529/2011 &Crl. MA 4832/2011 Rohit Soni Petitioner Through: Mr. Brajpal Singh, Advocate versus State Respondent Through: Ms.Flzani Husain, APR for State Mr. R.S. Juneja, Advocate for the % complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA