VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Rajender Dubey @ Deepu v. Smt. Arti

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2024
Bench
Anish Dayalauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 7081/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anish Dayal

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2024

¶1Counsel for the petitioner states that this petition challenges the impugned order dated 16th July 2024, passed in CRL.A. 59/2024. By the said impugned order, appeal under Section 29 of the DV Act was dismissed, challenging the award of interim maintenance of Rs. 32,000/- per month, in addition to the maintenance granted by the Family Court of Rs. 11,000/- per month, to the respondent/wife and two minor children of 11 and 7 years who are staying with the wife.

¶2It is noted in the order dated 24th August 2023, passed in application under Section 23 of DV Act, that Rs. 11,000/- granted by the Family Court under Section 125 Cr.P.C., was directed, after assessing the monthly income to be around Rs. 35,000/- per month. The Court has then gone on to advert to the credit transactions in the account of the petitioner, as well as the income affidavit, and assessed the income to be at least Rs. 80,000/- per This is a digitally signed order. month, on which basis, an additional amount of Rs. 32,000/- per month was granted in favour of respondent/wife.

¶3The Court has perused the orders and heard counsels for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner states that assessment raised by the Magistrate at Mahila Court was erroneous.

¶4Counsel for the respondent, however, states that the whole assessment was accurate and was based on the documents on record of the Court.

¶5This Court has also perused the said record and does not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order.

¶6Accordingly, petition is dismissed. Pending applications also stand disposed of as infructuous.

¶7Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024 DU This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7081/2024 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 27035-36/2024 RAJENDER DUBEY @ DEEPU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Birendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate. versus SMT. ARTI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta and Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, Advocates along with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.