VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Raju Sawant v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
8 July 2013
Bench
Sunil Gaurauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 550/2013

Judgment

ORDER

08.07.2013 Petitioners'in the above-captionedtwo petitions,claiming to be CollectionAgentofMs AsijaSecurityPvt. Ltd. &RachitFinancialPvt Ltd., are seeking regular bail in FIR No. 16/2013, registered under Sections 420/406/468/471/506/34r/w Sec. 120B of the IPG, at police station Jahangirpuri, Delhi. BailApplication No. 550/2013 BailApplication No. 706/2013 Page 1 ' -it t While entertainingthese applications,petitionerswere directedto join the investigation. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-Statesubmitsthatpetitionershavejoinedthe investigationbut out of four TCRs, only one has been recoveredand the remainingthree TCRs could not be recovered from the addresses furnished by the petitioners. Consideringthe status report filed, the stand of petitioners,as disclosed in Annexures P-14 &; P-17, and without commenting on the merits ofthis case, interimordersof 5"^ April, 2013 (in Bail Application ^ No.550/2013)and 29^ April, 2013 (in Bail ApplicationNo. 706/2013) are made absolute.Let petitionersjoin the investigationof this case as and when calledby noticein writing. In the event of arrest,petitioners-Raju Sawant,son ofShriH.S.Sawantand KartarSingh,son ofShri Khem Chand be admitted to bail on their furnishing bail bond in the sum of ?30,000/-with one surety each in the like amount,to the satisfactionof the Investigating Officer/ Arresting Officer. Needlessto say that if petitionersdo not join and cooperatewith the investigationofthis case, then respondent-Statewouldbe at libertyto get this order revoked. ^ Above captionedtwo applicationsare disposedof with aforesaid directions. JULY 08, 2013 r JNIL GAUR) JUDGE BailApplicationNo. 550/2013 Page2 BailApplication No. 706/2013

Case details

Parties and counsel

>:4 (^) i j> * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 550/2013 + % RAJU SAWANT Through: versus STATE Through; Petitioner Mr. Manish Kumar Saryal & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates Respondent Mr. MukeshGupta,Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Amarpreet BAIT. APPLN. 706/2013 KARTARSINGH Petitioner Through: Mr. ManishKumarSaryal& Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. MukeshGupta,Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Amarpreet CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.