- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 20 August 2026
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- RFA 869/2026
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Neena Bansal Krishna
Judgment
O R D E R %
20.08.2026
¶1An Appeal under Section 96 read with Section XLI CPC has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2026, whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff/Respondent for Possession, Permanent Injunction and Mesne Profits has been decreed.
¶2The Appellant who is present in the Court along with learned Counsel undertakes to vacate the property within three months from today. The Appellant also undertakes not to create any third party rights or cause damage to the property, till the time he vacate the same. The Appellant also undertakes that he shall not seek any further extension of time to vacate the This is a digitally signed order. premises.
¶3Learned counsel for the Respondent on instructions from the Respondent states that in case the property is vacated within three months, the Respondent shall forego his claim for Mesne Profits.
¶4It is also agreed that in case the Appellant fails to perform his part of the Settlement and vacate the premises within three months, the Respondent shall be at liberty to seek the execution of the Decree.
¶5The Undertaking be filed by both the parties within seven days.
¶6In view of the Settlement, the Appeal is disposed of. However, the eviction of the property and the relief in respect of Mesne Profits shall be effected in terms of the Settlement between the parties.
¶7The pending Applications also disposed of accordingly.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 20, 2026/va This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010389182026 + RFA 869/2026, CAV 397/2026, CM APPL. 56110/2026, CM APPL. 56111/2026, CM APPL. 56112/2026, CM APPL. 56113/2026, CM APPL. 56114/2026 LALLEY YADAV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shivam Shrivastava, Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Mr. Rishesh Shikarwar, Mr. Abhishek Nandan, Mr. Sagar Shresth, Mr. Vikas Singh, Ms. Bhumika Tilyani and Mr. Prabhas, Advocates. versus RAJ KHANNA .....Respondent Through: Mr. B S Dhir, Mr. Puneett S Dhir, Ms. Shuchi Sood, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.