- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 20 August 2026
- Bench
- Anil Kshetarpal, Shail Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 11986/2026
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anil KshetarpalFollow Shail Jain
Judgment
O R D E R %
20.08.2026
¶1Through this Writ Petition, the Petitioner prays for the following reliefs: "(a) DECLARE that the two Form GST DRC-03 debits dated
30.07.2025 (ARN AD070725024398T and ARN AD070725024402C) were coerced and involuntary. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction QUASHING the recovery and retention of the interest and penalty of Rs.28,34,294 effected thereby.
(b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction DIRECTING Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to refund Rs. 28,34,294 to the Petitioner's bank account (HDFC Bank, Account No. 50200077563997, IFSC HDFC0000090), and not by re-credit to any electronic ledger. The refund to be independent of, and not conditioned upon, any pending or future investigation or proceeding. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
(c)DIRECT payment of interest on the said sum from 30.07.2025 till realisation, at not less than 6 percent per annum, rising to 12 percent per annum should payment not be made within the period this Hon'ble Court fixes.
(d)DIRECT the installation of CCTV and audio-video recording in the interrogation areas of the Respondent Commissionerate, in terms of Paramvir Singh Saini v Baljit Singh, (2021) 1 SCC 184, with night vision and audio as well as video capability, and preservation of recordings as therein directed. DIRECT that copies of such recordings be furnished to the assessee upon request, for use in any proceeding before a court of competent jurisdiction. …"
¶2In substance, the Petitioner claims that he was compelled to make payments amounting to Rs.28,34,294/- (together with interest) during the search of his premises and that such payments were made in violation of Instruction No.01/2022-23 (GST-Investigation) dated
25.05.2022 issued by the Commissioner (GST-Inv.), CBIC.
¶3In Paragraph No.8 of the Writ Petition (Page No.21 of the paper book), the Petitioner has disclosed the following payments made during the search of his premises:
¶8THE DAWN DEBITS. At 04:19 and 04:29 AM on 30.07.2025, while the officers remained present on the premises, two Forms GST DRC-03 were debited from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Ledger (Annexure P-4). Their composition is as follows:
Form GST DRC-03 Tax Interest Penalty Amount claimed Section ARN AD07072502 42951 (29.07.2025, 6:29 PM) 67,20,000 (not claimed)
Nil
Nil
Nil
73(5) ARN AD07072502 4398T (30.07.2025, 4:19 AM)
Nil
16,47,050
10,08,000
26,55,050
74(5) ARN AD07072502 4402C
4,53,628 (not
1,11,200
68,044
1,79,244
74(5) The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. (30.07.2025, 4:29 AM) claimed) Total
28,34,294
¶4Learned counsel representing the Petitioner admits that the payments of Rs.67,20,000/- and Rs.4,53,628/- are not being claimed, as these payments were made voluntarily. However, it is submitted that the payment of Rs.26,55,050/- was made involuntarily.
¶5Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that all the payments were made voluntarily and that there was no coercion on the part of the members of the search team.
¶6It is further contended that the investigation against the Petitioner is pending and the matter is likely to be concluded shortly.
¶7In the facts of the present case, whether the payment of Rs.26,55,050/- was made voluntarily or under coercion involves a disputed question of fact. This is particularly so when the Petitioner does not dispute the voluntary nature of the other two payments made during the very same search proceedings.
¶8In these circumstances, this Court is not inclined to issue a writ directing refund of the amount claimed by the Petitioner. The Petitioner, if so advised, may avail such alternative remedy as may be available to him in law.
¶9With these observations, the present Writ Petition is disposed of.
¶10All the pending applications are also closed.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 20, 2026/sp/shah The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010386392026 + W.P.(C) 11986/2026, CM APPL. 55654/2026, CM APPL. 55655/2026 and CM APPL. 55656/2026 M/S NECTOR FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. APOORV AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Adv. versus THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Jamwal, SPC and Ms. Parul Mehra, GP for R- 1/UOI. Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Apurv Yadav and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.