Aryan v. The State of NCT of Delhi

O R D E R %

19.11.2024

¶1APP for the State, has handed up a Status report, along with the photocopy of the interrogation report of the petitioner. He states on instructions, that the investigation is complete and the charge sheet is expected to be filed.

¶2The petitioner was granted interim bail, by order dated 05th August 2024.

¶3The address of the petitioner has now been ascertained, and he has been joining in the investigation.

¶4This application has been filed, seeking anticipatory bail, in FIRNo.235/2024 P.S. Paharganj under Sections 394/34 IPC.

¶5The APP for the State, states that, pursuant to the investigation, Sections186/353 IPC, have also been added. This is a case of 3 boys This is a digitally signed order. havingintercepted a tempo. One of boys took the keys of the tempo and left withthe tempo, while the other two were accosted by the police, however, chose to escapefrom there. The police noted their car number and traced it and furtherinvestigation was carried out. The other two co-accused Himanshu andChetan are both on regular bail.

¶6The recovery, as per the investigation, is of a tempo and the mobile phone of the tempo driver, which was allegedly driven by Chetan, who is on regular bail. The petitioner isready to join the investigation and undertakes to do so.

¶7In these circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶8In lightof the above, the Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Consequently, in the event of arrest the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25, 000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/IO/SHO concerned, further subject to the condition that the petitioner will join investigation as and when directed and not influence any witness/complainant/victim or tamper with evidence of the case.

¶9Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

¶10Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024/RK/kp

Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2147/2024 ARYAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Mr. Harshdeep Nausran and Mr. Satyam Saxena, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Mr. Daljeet Singh, Advocate with SI Vikas Kasanan, PS: Paharganj. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL