VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Greenline Developers Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Dinesh Mehtaauthor, Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Case no.
W.P.(C) 5483/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1The present writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred the petitioner/assessee for the following four prayers: "a) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned notice dated

28.01.2026 issued under Section 226(3) of the Act by Respondent No.2; b) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to forthwith give effect to This is a digitally signed order. the binding appellate order dated 24.12.2009 passed by Ld. CIT(A) and order dated 21.01.2011 passed by the Ld. ITAT and to delete the non-existent demand for AY 2006–07 from all records, including the income-tax portal; c) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to refund all amounts illegally recovered and/or adjusted under Section 245 of the Act against the non-existent demand for AY 2006-07 along with applicable interest; d) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to withdraw all consequential recovery actions, including attachment of the Petitioner's bank account; e) award costs of the present proceedings in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent No.2 to 4 for their arbitrary and high-handed conduct;"

¶2Ms. Naincy Jain, learned junior standing counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4/Revenue, at the outset, submitted that all the petitioner's grievances have been favourably addressed by the respondent/Assessing Officer, for which she referred to a communication in this regard that has been sent to Mr. Shlok Chandra, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4.

¶3Mr. Sahar Irfan, learned counsel for the petitioner, accepts this position.

¶4In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with all the pending applications, is disposed of as having become infructuous.

DINESH MEHTA, J.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. AUGUST 24, 2026/kk This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010172302026 + W.P.(C) 5483/2026, CM APPL. 26904/2026, CM APPL. 26905/2026 & CM APPL. 26906/2026 GREENLINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahar Irfan, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC with Ms.Aditi Singh, GP & Mr. Nipun Jain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms.Naincy Jain & Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSCs & Mr. Udit Dad, Advs. for R-2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.