VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Ladli Devi @ Ruksana Khatoon v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
9 November 2011
Bench
Badar Durrez Ahmedauthor, Veena Birbal
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 263/2011

Judgment

ORDER

09.11.2011 We are informed that the next date in the proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindi Marriage Act filed on behalf of the petitioner is 30.11.2011. The next date in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is 18.02.2012. In the meanwhile, the petitioner's husband Anuj Kumar, who is present in court has agreed to pay < 1500/- per month by.way of interim ad hoc arrangement to the petitioner. Insofar as the current month of November is concerned, he shall pay { 1500/- to the petitioner within one week and thereafter by the 1Oft of each month he shall pay { 1500/- to the petitioner till orders are passed in the maintenance applications filed by the petitioner before ',the Metropolitan Magistrate/ Additional District Judge. The Metropolitan Magistrate/ Additional District Judge dealing with the maintenanoe applications shall be uninfluenced by the interim arrangement oh ,j .-/ that we have made and any maintenance granted by either of the courts would be after adjusting the amounts paid, as per the agreed interim affangement mentioned above. If there is any change in the address of the petitioner's husband Anuj Kumar, he shall inform the concerned police station. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Anuj Kumar assures this court that Anuj Kumar shall appear before the appropriate court in which the proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act lCr.P.C. are going on. In view of the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. /*zee.r'-.L BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J NOVEMBER 09,2011 srb L

Case details

Parties and counsel

K a": $-4 *< IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(cRL) 26312011 LADLI DEVI @ RUKSANA KHATOON ..... Petitioner .J Through Mr Murari Choudhary, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St. Counsel for State. Mr Alok Sinha, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.