VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2025 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Alok Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P

Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
25 September 2025
Case no.
NABAIL 7967/2025

Judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7967 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶1Heard counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶2The instant application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 292 of 2025 under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 351(2), 308(5) of B.N.S., Police Station Sarai Lakhansi, District Mau.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Primarily, the allegation of extortion has been levelled against the co-accused, Atul Kumar Sagar. The case of the applicant is distinguishable from that of co-accused, Atul Kumar Sagar. In the alleged incident, the informant has not received any injury. No medical report is available in the case diary. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The investigation is still pending. It is next submitted that the applicant has apprehension of his arrest and in case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶4Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶5Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Alok Kumar Gupta .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

¶6Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that primarily, the allegation of extortion has been levelled against the co-accused, Atul Kumar Sagar; in the alleged incident, the informant has not received any injury; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.

¶7In the event of arrest, the applicant-Alok Kumar Gupta be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶8In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶9The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶10The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the NABAIL No. 7967 of 2025 S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶11The application stands disposed of.

September 26, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7967 of 2025 (Vivek Varma,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.