- Court
- High Court of Meghalaya
- Decided
- 28 July 2025
- Bench
- I.P. Mukerji, Chief Justice, W. Diengdoh, Judge
- Case no.
- MC(PIL) 2/2025
Follow Meghalaya High CourtFollow I.P. MukerjiFollow Chief JusticeFollow W. Diengdoh
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
MC(PIL) No. 2 of 2025 Date of order: 28.07.2025
Meghalaya and Greater Shillong Progressive Hawkers and Street Vendors Association represented by its General Secretary Shri Shane Thabah
…..Applicant -versus -
¶1Shri Andrew Aibok Jyrwa
¶2The State of Meghalaya represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya.
¶3The Commissioner and Secretary, Urban Affairs Department, Government of Meghalaya Shillong, Meghalaya.
¶4The Director General of Police, Meghalaya, East Khasi Hills District, Pin-793001, Shillong.
¶5The Superintendent of Police (Traffic), East Khasi Hills District, Pin-793001, Shillong
¶6The Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong, Meghalaya.
¶7The Shillong Municipal Board represented by its Chief Executive Officer, Shillong.
¶8The Town Vending Committee, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
¶9Shillong Roadside Hawkers Association, represented by Working President, having its registered office at Gita Bhavan, Thana Road, Shillong.
…Proforma Respondent Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice I.P. Mukerji, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Serial No. 01 Daily List
Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr P. Yobin, Adv
For the Respondents : Mr N. Syngkon, Adv [for R1]
Mrs T. Yangi B., AAG with
Mr K.P. Bhattacharjee, GA [for R2-6]
Mr Philemon Nongbri, Adv [for R7]
i) Whether approved for
reporting in Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication
in press: Note: For proper public information and transparency, any media reporting this judgment is directed to mention the composition of the bench by name of judges, while reporting this judgment/order.
Mrs. Yangi, learned Additional Advocate General submits before this Court that the government has kept its promise of relocating the licensed vendors in police bazar to the newly designated vending areas, by 22nd July, 2025 which was the stipulated date.
Mr Yobin, learned Advocate appearing for the vendors' Association does not contradict this submission. Nevertheless, he submits that the licences of some of the vendors have been wrongfully revoked and hence, they could not be relocated.
The subject-matter of this application was for modification of our earlier order granting limited time to licensed vendors to vend from police bazar. It was said that this restricted timing was affecting their business. In those circumstances, we enlarged the time permitting them to vend in
the said area. At the same time, the government and public authorities assured the Court that the licensed vendors would be relocated by 22nd July, 2025.
Since that goal has been achieved, nothing remains in this application.
Some additional issues like the one raised by Mr. Yobin noted above and the question of relocation of licensed vendors from other crowded public places to designated vending areas and eviction of unlicensed and unauthorised vendors from those places and all other related or ancillary issues shall be considered when we take up the main public interest litigation for further consideration on 5th August, 2025. List accordingly.
MC(PIL) No. 2 of 2025 is disposed of.
(W. Diengdoh) (I.P. Mukerji)
Judge Chief Justice
Date: 2025.07.28 18:39:46 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.