Surendra Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 14 Others

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10858 of 2024 Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tiwari,Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard. There is a private dispute between private parties. Certain allegations have been made against the official opposite parties also. The factual disputes involved cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If anybody is asking for illegal gratification, then the petitioner can lodge an F.I.R. or a complaint case or initiate such other proceedings as may be permissible under the law or can make a complaint to the higher authorities, who can get the matter inquired. So far as the private dispute is concerned, the remedy lies under the civil/ revenue/ criminal law as may be prescribed under the law. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Gurpreet Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench