Kajal Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. -15 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. -13143 of 2024 Applicant :-Kajal Verma Opposite Party :-State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :-Umesh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :-G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release her on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 0004 of 2024 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 of IPC and Section-66-C of I.T. Act, P.S.-Cyber Crime Police Thana District -Pratapgarh. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant matter due to ulterior motive. He submits the applicant is not named in the first information report and even the statement of the victim is also apparent that the applicant is not named. He added that the applicant is connected in the instant matter only while recording the confessional statement and there is no CCTV footage so as to corroborate the story of prosecution. He added that the applicant has no previous criminal history as is mentioned in paragraph no. 21 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and she is languishing in jail since 10.10.2024 and she undertakes that in case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Per contra, learned AGA appearing for the State has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submitted that after thorough investigation, it was found that the applicant was involved in committing offence and as such, she is not entitled for any relief. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of material placed on record, it transpires that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.10.2024; prima facie, there is no cogent piece of evidence against the applicant so as to connect her with the offence; the applicant has no previous criminal history as is mentioned in paragraph no. 21 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application coupled with the fact that the applicant has undertaken that in case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case of bail. Let the applicant-Kajal Verma involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

(1) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, or otherwise during the investigation or trial;

(2) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. She shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of her absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against her under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

(3) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; and

(4) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the merits of the case. Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench