Transfer of Property Act, 1882 · Chapter II: Of Transfers of Property by Act of Parties · Apportionment
Section 43: Transfer by unauthorised person who subsequently acquires interest in property transferred
In plain words
If someone fraudulently or wrongly claims to have authority to transfer immovable property and does so for consideration, and later acquires an interest in it, the transfer can, at the buyer's option, take effect on that later interest. This is often called feeding the grant by estoppel.
- Good faith buyers for value without notice of this option are protected.
Example: A sells land that actually belongs to his father. Later A inherits it. The buyer can make A hand it over.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Where a person [fraudulently or] erroneously represents that he is authorised to transfer certain immovable property and professes to transfer such property for consideration, such transfer shall, at the option of the transferee, operate on any interest which the transferor may acquire in such property at any time during which the contract of transfer subsists.
Nothing in this section shall impair the right of transferees in good faith for consideration without notice of the existence of the said option.
Illustration
A, a Hindu who has separated from his father B, sells to C three fields, X, Y and Z, representing that A is authorised to transfer the same. Of these fields Z does not belong to A, it having been retained by B on the partition; but on B's dying A as heir obtains Z.C, not having rescinded the contract of sale, may require A to deliver Z to him .
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 43
- Chandan Ramamurthi & Anr v. M.R Krishnamurthi & Anr
- Kailash Aggarwal and Anr v. Ms. Chandan Ramamurthi and Anr
- Elumalai @ Venkatesan & Anr. v. M. Kamala
- Rakesh & Ors. v. Board of Revenue U.P. & Ors. Etc.
- Aftaruddin (Dead) Rep. Thr. Lrs. v. Ramkrishna Datta Alias Babul Datta & Ors.
- N. Venkateshappa v. Munemma & Ors.
- Kripa Mangal Karyalaya & Ors. v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation & Ors.
- Agricultural Produce Marketing Commitiee v. Bannama (D) by Lrs.
- Ni Pra Channabasava Deshikendra Swamigalu Matadhipathigalu Kannada Mutt v. C.P. Kaveeramma & Ors.
- Kammana Sambamurthy (D) by Lrs. v. Kalipatnapu Atchutamma (D) and Ors.
- Ni. Pra Channabasava D.S. Matadhipathigalu Kannada Mutt v. C.P. Kaveeramma and Ors.
- Jharu Ram Roy v. Ramjit Roy and Ors.
- Hardev Singh v. Gurmail Singh (Dead) by Lrs.
- N. Srinivasa Rao v. Spl. Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act and Ors.
- Hpa International v. Bhagwandas Fateh Chand Daswani and Ors.
- Renu Devi v. Mahendra Singh and Ors.
- Mithlesh Kumari and Anr. v. Fateh Bahadur Singh and Anr.
- Ram Bhawan Singh and Ors. v. Jagdish and Ors.
- Brahmvart Sanathan Dharam Mahamandal Kanpur & Ors. v. Prem Kumar & Ors.
- Ram Pyare v. Ram Narain & Others
- Raj Kumar Mohan Singh & Ors. v. Raj Kumar Pasupatinath Saran Singh & Ors.
- Silla Chandra Sekharam v. Ramchandra Sahu
- Raghunath Keshava Kharkar v. Ganesh and Others
- The Jumma Masjid, Mercara v. Kodimaniandra De\'Iah
- E. D. Sassoon and Company Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City