Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970
Section 2: Enlarged appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court in regard to criminal matters
Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause (1) of article 134 of the Constitution, an appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, final order or sentence in a criminal proceeding of a High Court in the territory of India if the High Court—
(a) has on appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and sentenced him to imprisonment for life or to imprisonment for a period of not less than ten years;
(b) has withdrawn for trial before itself any case from any court subordinate to its authority and has in such trial convicted the accused person and sentenced him to imprisonment for life or to imprisonment for a period of not less than ten years.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 2
- Vahitha v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Md. Anowar Hussain v. State of Assam
- Sandeep Alias Kala v. Supreme Court of India
- Manoj Pratap Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- Pappu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors.
- Upendra Pradhan v. State of Orissa
- Lal Bahadur & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Chinnam Kameswara Rao and Ors. v. State of Ap. Rep. by Home Secretary
- Jalpat Rai & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- A Shankar v. State of Karnataka
- Durbal v. State of U.P.
- Vithal Laxman Chalawadi & Etc. v. State of Karnataka Rep. by P. Prosecutor
- Sangappa Sanganabasappa M. & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Deen Dayal & Ors. v. State of U.P.
- Mahesh S/O.Janardhan Gonnade v. State of Maharashtra
- Vineet Kumar Chauhan v. State of U.P.
- Rajendra Datta Zarekar v. State of Goa
- Shaik China Brahmam v. State of A.P.
- Sukhram v. State of Maharashtra
- Samghaji Hariba Patil v. State of Karnataka
- Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra
- Hemraj and Anr. v. State of Punjab
- Thaman Kumar v. State of Union Territory of Chandigarh
- Mahabir Singh v. State of Haryana
- Shamnshaeb M. Multtani v. State of Karnataka
- Rammi @ Rameshwar Etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- George and Others v. State of Kearla and Anr .
- Pammi @Brijendra Singh v. Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
- Ammini and Ors. v. State of Kerala
- Bhupendrasinh A. Chudasama v. State of Gujarat
- B. Subba Rao and Ors. v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad
- Rattan Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- Sundaramurthi v. State of Tamil Nadu
- L/Nk. Meharaj Singh/Kalu v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Raja Ram and Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Chandra Mohan Tiwari and Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Narayan Singh & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Ramji Surjya & Another v. State of Maharashtra
- Rajput Ruda Maha and Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Sita Ram & Ors. v. State of U.P.
- Salim Zia v. State of U.P.
- Bhajan Singh v. State of Punjab
- Kishore Singh & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Piara Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab
- Rajendra Prasad v. State of Bihar
- Ramaswami Ayyangar and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Munnu Raja & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Apren Joseph Alias Current Kunjukunju & Ors. v. The State of Kerela