Specific Relief Act, 1963 · Chapter VIII: Perpetual Injunctions
Section 41: Injunction when refused
An injunction cannot be granted—
(a) to restrain any person from prosecuting a judicial proceeding pending at the institution of the suit in which the injunction is sought, unless such restraint is necessary to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings;
(b) to restrain any person from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in a court not sub-ordinate to that from which the injunction is sought;
(c) to restrain any person from applying to any legislative body;
(d) to restrain any person from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in a criminal matter;
(e) to prevent the breach of a contract the performance of which would not be specifically enforced;
(f) to prevent, on the ground of nuisance, an act of which it is not reasonably clear that it will be a nuisance;
(g) to prevent a continuing breach in which the plaintiff has acquiesced;
(h) when equally efficacious relief can certainly be obtained by any other usual mode of proceeding except in case of breach of trust;
[(ha) if it would impede or delay the progress or completion of any infrastructure project or interfere with the continued provision of relevant facility related thereto or services being the subject]matter of such project.
(i) when the conduct of the plaintiff or his agents has been such as to disentitle him to be the assistance of the court;
(j) when the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 41
-
Ltd. v. His Highness Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji Deo of Maihar
Whether the High Court was right in taking the view that the suit of the plaintiff for declaration of his title based on a valid Gift Deed should fail as the plaintiff omitted to pray for the consequential relief of…
-
The Correspondence, Rbanms Educational Institution v. B. Gunashekar & Another
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court and the trial court rejecting the application filed by the appellant u/Ord.VII r.11(a) and (d) CPC for the rejection of plaint.
-
Asma Lateef & Anr. v. Shabbir Ahmad & Ors.
Whether the order dated 05.08.1991 (vide which application u/ rr.5 and 10 of Or.VIII, CPC was allowed by the Trial Court for pronouncement of judgment against defendant no.2 in the suit) suffered from a jurisdictional…
-
Eldeco Housing and Industries Limited v. Ashok
A suit for specific performance was filed seeking enforcement of MoU dated 31.08.1998. It is in the aforesaid suit that application was filed by respondent No. 1 under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC for rejection of the…
- M/S Frost International Limited v. M/S Milan Developers and Builders (P) Limited & Anr.
- Padhiyar Prahladji Chenaji (Deceased) Through L.R.S v. Maniben Jagmalbhai (Deceased) Through L.R.S and Ors.
- Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian/Father Hari Singh) v. C.B.S.E. (Central Board of Secondary Education) & Ors
- Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. Regency Mahavir Properties & Ors.
- Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad v. Gangaram Narayan Ambekar & Ors.
- M/S Deep Industries Limited v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited & Anr.
- Hooghly Mills Company Ltd. v. The State of West Bengal and Anr.
- Dinesh Singh Thakur v. Sonal Thakur
- Patel Field Marshal Agencies and Anr. v. P.M. Diesels Ltd. and Anr.
- Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors. v. Orchid Infrastructure Developers P. Ltd.
- Zarif Ahmad (D} Through Lrs. & Another v. Mohd. Farooq
- Amar Nath v. Kewla Devi &Anr.
- M/S Best Sellers Retail (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. & Ors.
- Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes and Others v. Erasmo Jack De Sequeria(Dead) Through L.Rs.
- Pranab Kumar Pal v. M/S. Liz. Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- Narendra Gopal Vidyarthi v. Rajat Vidyarthi
- Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari
- Adhunik Steels Ltd. v. Orissa Manganese and Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
- M/S. Arvind Constructions Co. Pvt. Lid. v. M/S Kalinga Mining Corporation and Ors.
- Percept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Zaheer Khan
- M/S. Peico Electronics and Electricals and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
- Integrated Rural Development Agency v. Ram Pyare Pandey
- Premji Ratansey Shah and Ors v. Union of India and Ors.
- Nandganj Sihori Sugar Co. Ltd., Rae Bareli v. Badri Nath Dixit and Ors.