Specific Relief Act, 1963 · Chapter II: Specific Performance of Contracts · Contracts which cannot be specifically enforced
Section 14: Contracts not specifically enforceable
1The following contracts cannot be specifically enforced, namely:—
(a) where a party to the contract has obtained substituted performance of contract in accordance with the provisions of section 20;
(b) a contract, the performance of which involves the performance of a continuous duty which the court cannot supervise;
(c) a contract which is so dependent on the personal qualifications of the parties that the court cannot enforce specific performance of its material terms; and
(d) a contract which is in its nature determinable.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 14
-
K.S. Manjunath and Others v. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the vendees and set aside the decree passed by the Trial Court, while granting the relief of specific…
-
Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited v. Samir Narain Bhojwani
In the instant case, issue revolves around the power of the Appellate Court dealing with the appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to pass an order of remand to Section 34 Court.
- Victory Iron Works Ltd. v. Jitendra Lohia & Anr.
- M/S. Shivali Enterprises v. Smt. Godawari (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. and Others
- Narendra Hirawat and Co. v. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
- Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Vishal Ghisulal Jain, Resolution Professional, Sk Wheels Private Limited
- Rapid Metrorail Gurgaon Limited Etc. v. Haryana Mass Rapid Transport Corporation Limited & Ors.
- Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- Association of Medical Super Specialityaspirants and Residents & Ors. v. Union of India & Others
- Mehboob-Ur-Rehman (Dead) Through Lrs. v. Ahsanul Ghani
- Sushil Kumar Agarwal v. Meenakshi Sadhu & Ors.
- Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Nilofer Siddiqui & Ors.
- Vasanti Bhat v. Premlata Agarwal & Anr. Etc.
- Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.
- Rattan Lal (Since Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives v. S.N. Bhalla & Ors.
- M/S Best Sellers Retail (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. & Ors.
- Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala v. Mangal Singh and Ors.
- Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. C.P. Sabastian
- Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation --I & Anr. v. Bal Mukund Bairwa
- State Bank of India and Ors. v. S.N. Goyal
- Rajasthan Srtc & Ors v. Mohar Singh
- The General Manager, Pench Area, Parasia, M.P. v. Barkan@ Kanhaiya
- The Empire Jute Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. The Jute Corporation of India Ltd. and Anr.
- Adhunik Steels Ltd. v. Orissa Manganese and Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
- M/S. Puravankara Projects Ltd. v. M/S. Hotel Venus International and Ors.
- P.D. Agrawal v. State Bank of India and Ors.
- Union of India v. Mis. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.
- Percept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Zaheer Khan
- Mrs. Sanjana M. Wig v. Hindustan Petro Corporation Ltd.
- Hpa International v. Bhagwandas Fateh Chand Daswani and Ors.
- Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. Machado Brothers and Ors.
- Hardesh Ores Pvt. Ltd. v. Timblo Minerals Pvt. Ltd.,And Ors.
- M/S. Peico Electronics and Electricals and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
- Rachakonda Narayana v. Ponthala Parvathamma and Anr.
- Her Highness Maharani Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v. Savjibhai Haribhai Patel and Ors.
- Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. Etc. v. Krishna Kant Etc. Etc.
- Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Amritsar Gas Service and Ors.