Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
Section 3: Power of court to release certain offenders after admonition
When any person is found guilty of having committed an offence punishable under section 379 or section 380 or section 381 or section 404 or section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860) or any offence punishable with imprisonment for not more than two years, or with fine, or with both, under the Indian Penal Code or any other law, and no previous conviction is proved against him and the court by which the person is found guilty is of opinion that, having regard to the circumstances of the case including the nature of the offence, and the character of the offender, it is expedient so to do, then, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the court may, instead of sentencing him to any punishment or releasing him on probation of good conduct under section 4, release him after due admonition.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, previous conviction against a person shall include any previous order made against him under this section or section 4.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 3
-
Suhas Chakma v. Union of India & Ors.
Access to free and timely legal aid for prison inmates.
-
Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar & Anr.
Need for a comprehensive sentencing policy. Trial against the accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was conducted by the judicial officer in utmost haste and the accused was denied due…
- Parmod Kumar Kushwaha v. State of Delhi
- Som Dutt & Ors. v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra
- Mohd. Hashim v. State of UP & Ors.
- Birju v. State of M.P.
- Sanjay Dutt (A-117) v. The State of Maharashtra, Through CBI (Stf), Bombay
- Punjab Water Supply Sewerage Board and Anr. v. Ram Sajivan and Anr.
- Gulzar v. State of M.P.
- Prithvi Raj and Ors. v. Kamlesh Kumar and Anr.
- State of Karnataka v. Mohamed Nazeer @ Babu
- Commandant 20 Bn. Itb Police v. Sanjay Binjola
- State of U.P. v. Mata Bhikh and Ors.
- Union of India and Ors. v. Bakshi Ram
- Union of India and Another v. Tulsiram Patel and Others
- Superintendent, Central Excise, Bangalore v. Bahubali
- Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway & Anr. v. T. R. Challappan
- Lala Ram v. Hari Ram
- Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab