Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 · Chapter IV: Investigation Into Cases Under the Act
Section 17: Persons authorised to investigate
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), no police officer below the rank,—
(a) in the case of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, of an Inspector of Police;
(b) in the metropolitan areas of Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and Ahmedabad and in any other metropolitan area notified as such under sub-section (1) of section 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), of an Assistant Commissioner of Police;
(c) elsewhere, of a Deputy Superintendent of Police or a police officer of equivalent rank,
shall investigate any offence punishable under this Act without the order of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class, as the case may be, or make any arrest therefor without a warrant:
Provided that if a police officer not below the rank of an Inspector of Police is authorised by the State Government in this behalf by general or special order, he may also investigate any such offence without the order of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class, as the case may be, or make arrest therefor without a warrant:
Provided further that an offence referred to in [clause (b) of sub-section (1)] of section 13 shall not be investigated without the order of a police officer not below the rank of a Superintendent of Police.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 17
-
Dashrath v. The State of Maharashtra
The conviction of the appellant as well as the sentence imposed on him u/ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is questioned.
-
State of Karnataka v. Sri Channakeshava.H.D. & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the FIR against the respondent no.1-public servant under Section 13(1)(b) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in a case of Disproportionate Assets,…
-
State of Karnataka v. T.N. Sudhakar Reddy
Whether High Court was justified in quashing the FIR registered against the Respondent in the absence of a preliminary enquiry before registration of FIR under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988;…
- CBI v. R.R. Kishore
- Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Sri Narendra Kumar A. Baldota v. The State of Karnataka
- The State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others v. Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman
- The State of Telangana v. Sri Managipet @ Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy
- Yashwant Sinha & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Director & Anr.
- State Represented by Inspector of Police Central Bureau of Investigation v. M. Subrahmanyam
- Union of India Etc. Rep. Through Superintendent of Police v. T. Nathamuni
- Divine Retreat Centre v. State of Kerala & Ors.
- Vishwanath Chaturvedi v. Union of India and Ors.
- State Inspector of Police, Visakhapatnam v. Surya Sankaram Karri
- State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu v. V. Jayapaul
- State by Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sh. S. Bangarappa
- State of Gujarat v. K. v. Joseph Etc.
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shri Ram Singh
- C. Rangaswamaiah and Ors. v. Karnataka Lokayukta and Ors.