Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 · Chapter IV: Procedure, Powers and Duties of Authorities
Section 19: Period of operation of settlements and awards
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was repealed and replaced by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 from 21 November 2025. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
This section sets how long settlements and awards last.
- A settlement starts on the agreed date or on signing, and lasts for the agreed period or six months, then continues until two months after either side gives notice to end it.
- An award lasts one year from when it becomes enforceable. The government can shorten it or extend it by up to one year at a time, to a maximum of three years.
- If circumstances change materially, the government can refer the award to decide whether to shorten it.
- An award stays binding until two months after notice to end it, and notices must be given by a party representing the majority.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) A settlement *** shall come into operation on such date as is agreed upon by the parties to the dispute, and if no date is agreed upon, on the date on which the memorandum of the settlement is signed by the parties to the dispute.
(2) Such settlement shall be binding for such period as is agreed upon by the parties, and if no such period is agreed upon, for a period of six months [from the date on which the memorandum of settlement settlement is signed by the parties to the dispute], and shall continue to be binding on the parties after the expiry of the period aforesaid, until the expiry of two months from the date on which a notice in writing of an intention to terminate the settlement is given by one of the parties to the other party or parties to the settlement. [(3) An award shall, subject to the provisions of this section, remain in operation for a period of one year [from the date on which the award becomes enforceable under section 17A]:
Provided that the appropriate Government may reduce the said period and fix such period as it thinks fit:
Provided further that the appropriate Government may, before the expiry of the said period, extend the period of operation by any period not exceeding one year at a time as it thinks fit so, however, that the total period of operation of any award does not exceed three years from the date on which it came into operation.
(4) Where the appropriate Government, whether of its own motion or on the application of any party bound by the award, considers that since the award was made, there has been a material change in the circumstances on which it was based, the appropriate Government may refer the award or a part of it [to a Labour Court, if the award was that of a Labour Court or to a Tribunal, if the award was that of a Tribunal or of a National Tribunal] for decision whether the period of operation should not, by reason of such change, be shortened and the decision of [Labour Court or the Tribunal, as the case may be] on such reference shall, *** be final.
(5) Nothing contained in sub-section (3) shall apply to any award which by its nature, terms or other circumstances does not impose, after it has been given effect to, any continuing obligation on the parties bound by the award.
(6) Notwithstanding the expiry of the period of operation under sub-section (3), the award shall continue to be binding on the parties until a period of two months has elapsed from the date on which notice is given by any party bound by the award to the other party or parties intimating its intention to terminate the award. [(7) No notice given under sub-section (2) or sub-section (6) shall have effect, unless it is given by a party representing the majority of persons bound by the settlement or award, as the case may be.]]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 19
- Ranbir Singh v. Sk Roy, Chairman, Life Insurance Corp. of India & Anr.
- Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary Uc Employees Association v. Life Insurance Corporation of India& Ors.
- Central Organisation of Tamil Nadu Electricity Employees v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- M.P. Vidyut Karamchari Sangh v. M.P. Electricity Board
- National Textile Corporation (Apkkm) Limited v. Sree Yellamma Cotton, Woollen and Silk, Mills Staff Association and Ors
- National Engineering Industries Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- Management of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Etc. v. Ksrtc Staff and Workers Federation and Anr. Etc.
- The Patiala Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. The Patiala Central Cooperative Bank Employees Union and Anr. Etc.
- M/S. Gujarat Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. v. Collector, Central Excise, Baroda.
- Comorin Match Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Indian Aluminium Co. Etc. Etc. v. State of Kerala and Ors.
- Rajasthan State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Laxman Lal Etc. Etc.
- Karnani Properties Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
- Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik Parishad and Others v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others
- General Manager, Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad v. R.S. Sharma & Ors.
- Workmen of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Refining Division) Bombay v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another
- A.V. Nachane & Another v. Union of India & Another
- The Life Insurance Corporation of India v. D. J. Bahadur & Ors.
- Shukla Manseta Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. The Workmen Employed Under It
- Cox & Kings (Agents) Ltd. v. Their Workmen and Ors.
- Management of Bangalore Woollen, Cotton & Silk Mills Co. Ltd. v. The Workmen & Anr.
- Birla Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills v. Workmen and Others
- The Workmen of Western India Match Co. Ltd. v. The Western India Match Co. Ltd.,
- S.S. Shetty v. Bharat Nidhi, Ltd.
- Burn & Co., Calcutta v. Their Employees
- The Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi v. Employees of the Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi