Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 · Chapter III: Reference of Disputes to Boards, Courts or Tribunals
Section 10: Reference of disputes to Boards, Courts or Tribunals
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was repealed and replaced by the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 from 21 November 2025. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
When an industrial dispute exists or is feared, the appropriate Government can refer it to a Board, a Court of Inquiry, a Labour Court or an Industrial Tribunal. This reference is how most disputes reach adjudication.
- Third Schedule disputes affecting not more than one hundred workmen can go to a Labour Court.
- For a public utility service where a strike notice is given, the government must refer the dispute unless the notice is frivolous or vexatious.
- If the majority of each party applies, the government must make the reference.
- The order sets a deadline for the award, which for an individual workman cannot exceed three months, though it can be extended. Proceedings do not lapse on its expiry or on a workman's death.
- The government can prohibit a continuing strike or lock-out once the dispute is referred, and the court decides only the points referred.
- The Central Government can refer disputes of national importance to a National Tribunal.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Read the in-depth explanation, with key Supreme Court rulings ↓
Official text
(1) [Where the appropriate Government is of opinion that any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, it may at any time], by order in writing,—
(a) refer the dispute to a Board for promoting a settlement thereof; or
(b) refer any matter appearing to be connected with or relevant to the dispute to a Court for inquiry; or [(c) refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, if it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule, to a Labour Court for adjudication; or
(d) refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, whether it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Schedule, to a Tribunal for adjudication:
Provided that where the dispute relates to any matter specified in the Third Schedule and is not likely to affect more than one hundred workmen, the appropriate Government may, if it so thinks fit, make the reference to a Labour Court under clause (c):] [Provided further that] where the dispute relates to a public utility service and a notice under section 22 has been given, the appropriate Government shall, unless it considers that the notice has been frivolously or vexatiously given or that it would be inexpedient so to do, make a reference under this sub-section notwithstanding that any other proceedings under this Act in respect of the dispute may have commenced: [Provided also that where the dispute in relation to which the Central Government is the appropriate Government, it shall be competent for that Government to refer the dispute to a Labour Court or an Industrial Tribunal, as the case may be, constituted by the State Government.] [(1A) Where the Central Government is of opinion that any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended and the dispute involves any question of national importance or is of such a nature that industrial establishments situated in more than one State are likely to be interested in, or affected by, such dispute and that the dispute should be adjudicated by a National Tribunal, then, the Central Government may, whether or not it is the appropriate Government in relation to that dispute, at any time, by order in writing, refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, whether it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Schedule, to a National Tribunal for adjudication.]
(2) Where the parties to an industrial dispute apply in the prescribed manner, whether jointly or separately, for a reference of the dispute to a Board, Court, [Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal], the appropriate Government, if satisfied that the persons applying represent the majority of each party, shall make the reference accordingly. [(2A) An order referring an industrial dispute to a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal under this section shall specify the period within which such Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal shall submit its award on such dispute to the appropriate Government:
Provided that where such industrial dispute is connected with an individual workman, no such period shall exceed three months:
Provided further that where the parties to an industrial dispute apply in the prescribed manner, whether jointly or separately, to the Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal for extension of such period or for any other reason, and the presiding officer of such Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal considers it necessary or expedient to extend such period, he may for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend such period by such further period as he may think fit:
Provided also that in computing any period specified in this sub-section, the period, if any, for which the proceedings before the Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal had been stayed by any injunction or order of a Civil Court shall be excluded:
Provided also that no proceedings before a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal shall lapse merely on the ground that any period specified under this sub-section had expired without such proceedings being completed.]
(3) Where an industrial dispute has been referred to a Board, [Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal] under this section, the appropriate Government may by order prohibit the continuance of any strike or lock-out in connection with such dispute which may be in existence on the date of the reference. [(4) Where in an order referring an industrial dispute to [a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal] under this section or in a subsequent order, the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for adjudication, [the Labour Court or the Tribunal or the National Tribunal, as the case may be], shall confine its adjudication to those points and matters incidental thereto.
(5) Where a dispute concerning any establishment or establishments has been, or is to be, referred to a [Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal] under this section and the appropriate Government is of opinion, whether on an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, that the dispute is of such a nature that any other establishment, group or class of establishments of a similar nature is likely to be interested in, or affected by, such dispute, the appropriate Government may, at the time of making the reference or at any time thereafter but before the submission of the award, include in that reference such establishment, group or class of establishments, whether or not at the time of such inclusion any dispute exists or is apprehended in that establishment, group or class of establishments.] [(6) Where any reference has been made under sub-section (1A) to a National Tribunal, then notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, no Labour Court or Tribunal shall have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon any matter which is under adjudication before the National Tribunal, and accordingly,—
(a) if the matter under adjudication before the National Tribunal is pending a proceeding before a Labour Court or Tribunal, the proceeding before the Labour Court or the Tribunal, as the case may be, in so far as it relates to such matter, shall be deemed to have been quashed on such reference to the National Tribunal; and
(b) it shall not be lawful for the appropriate Government to refer the matter under adjudication before the National Tribunal to any Labour Court or Tribunal for adjudication during the pendency of the proceeding in relation to such matter before the National Tribunal. [Explanation.—In this sub-section, “Labour Court” or “Tribunal” includes any Court or Tribunal or other authority constituted under any law relating to investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in any State.]
(7) Where any industrial dispute, in relation to which the Central Government is not the appropriate Government, is referred to a National Tribunal, then notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any reference in section 15, section 17, section 19, section 33A, section 33B and section 36A to the appropriate Government in relation to such dispute shall be construed as a reference to the Central Government but, save as aforesaid and as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, any reference in any other provision of this Act to the appropriate Government in relation to that dispute shall mean a reference to the State Government.] [(8) No proceedings before a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal in relation to an industrial dispute shall lapse merely by reason of the death of any of the parties to the dispute being a workman, and such Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal shall complete such proceedings and submit its award to the appropriate Government.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Understanding this section
Section 10 is the gateway to adjudication. When the appropriate Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, it may refer the dispute to a Board, a Court of Inquiry, a Labour Court or a Tribunal. The workman cannot, as a rule, go straight to the Labour Court.
The nature of the power
Making or refusing a reference is an administrative act, not a judicial one. The Government forms an opinion on whether a dispute exists. It is not meant to decide who is right. If it refuses to refer because it has, in effect, decided the merits, the courts can direct it to reconsider or to refer.
The Government decides the terms of reference, and the Labour Court or Tribunal cannot go beyond them. That is why the wording of the reference matters so much in practice.
Delay
No limitation period applies to a reference, and the section says the Government may refer at any time. But a dispute raised after many years without explanation may be treated as stale, and the Government may decline to refer it.
Which Labour Court or Tribunal
| Forum | Matters | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Labour Court | Second Schedule matters, such as dismissal and the legality of standing orders | Section 10(1)(c) |
| Tribunal | Second or Third Schedule matters, such as wages, bonus and retrenchment | Section 10(1)(d) |
| Labour Court for Third Schedule matter | Only if the dispute is not likely to affect more than one hundred workmen | First proviso |
Key Supreme Court rulings
State of Bihar v. D.N. Ganguly [1959] 1 S.C.R. 1191
A reference under section 10(1) is in the nature of an administrative act, and the Government had no power to cancel or supersede a reference once made.
Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Bihar 1989 INSC 152
While deciding whether to refer, the Government may not adjudicate the merits, such as whether a master and servant relationship exists. Where it had done so, the Court itself directed a reference.
Secretary, Indian Tea Association v. Ajit Kumar Barat 2000 INSC 67
The Government may decline to refer when the claimant is plainly not a workman, and a court should not readily order a reference against that view.
Prabhakar v. Joint Director, Sericulture Department 2015 INSC 1014
Although no limitation applies to a reference, a dispute raised fourteen years after termination without explanation had ceased to exist, and the reference was bad.
Common mistakes
- Treating the refusal to refer as a final decision on the merits. It is an administrative opinion open to judicial review.
- Arguing points before the Labour Court that fall outside the terms of reference.
Read with: Section 2A Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 12 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Prepared with AI assistance as a study aid. Every ruling listed was checked against the Supreme Court's own judgments on this site, and quoted words appear in those judgments; linked names open the full judgment. Read the judgments themselves before relying on them. Not legal advice.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 10
-
The Management of Worth Trust v. The Secretary, Worth Trust Workers Union
Issue arose as to whether the appellant-trust which is engaged in charitable and also commercial activities can be exempted under section 32 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and thus, not liable to pay any bonus to its…
- Naba Kumar Mandal v. Ircon International Ltd
- K.P.Singh v. U.O.I & Ors
- Indraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd v. Hero Solar Energy Private Limited
- M/S Deutsche Lufthansa Ag v. Mr. Nayan Pahwa & Ors
- Bikram Bhattacharjee v. M/S Singer India Ltd
- Sawhney Rubber Industries v. Workmen
- Hindustan Engineering and General Majdoor Union Through Its General Secretary Narayan Singh v. Kapson Worldwide
- Food Corporation of India v. Union of India & Ors
- M/S Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital and Ayurvedic Research Institute v. Sh Banwari Lal
- Jaima Millia Islamia v. Sh. Vikas
- D.T.C v. Ami Chand
- Ajai Kumar & Ors v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Anr
-
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. Brajrajnagar Coal Mines Workers’ Union
Whether the Tribunal was justified in entertaining the reference of an industrial dispute when a binding settlement under Section 18 (1) read with Section 19(2) and Section 36 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was…
- The Regional Manager Central Bank of India v. Kunwar Pal Singh
- M/S Shuban Sai Honda v. Rajesh Kumar
- Rudal Prajapati v. Jain Samnopasak Sr. Sec. School and Anr
- Uttam Chand Bhatia v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- The Indian Express P Ltd v. The Indian Express Newspapers Workers Union Regd and Anr
- Megh Kumar Jain v. M/S India Overseas Coporation and Ors
- Sarita Tiwari v. Aastha Garments
- Delhi Transport Corporation v. Sh Rameshwar Dayal (Deceased Through His Lrs) and Another
- Delhi Transport Corporation v. Rameshwar Dayal (Deceased) Through Lrs
- Surajpal Singh v. The General Manager, National Thermal Power Corporation
- N.T.P.C Ltd v. Sh. Surajpal Singh
-
Hind Filters Ltd. & Anr. v. Hind Filter Employees’
The stand taken by the appellants-Management was that in its establishment, there wer e more than 100 workmen, hence, reference of a dispute to the Labour Court was witho ut jurisdiction and consequently, any award…
- Santosh Devi v. Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital Shahdara Delhi
- Yunus Khan v. Haryana Roadways Through Its General Manager
- D.T.C v. Narendra Kumar & Ors
- Narender Kumar v. D.T.C. & Anr
- Executive Staff Union. v. Employer in Relation to the
- Bank of Baroda Erstwhile Vijaya Bank v. Union of India & Ors
- Naseem Ahmad v. Gen. Manager Vijaya Bank
- Vijaya Bank v. Naseem Ahmed
- Yad Ram Conductor v. Dtc
- Delhi Transport Corporation v. The P.O.,Yad Ram
- Dtc v. Baleshwar
- Vijay Kumar Jhamb v. Union of India
- D.T.C v. Salek Chand
- Director Icar v. Sh Virender Kumar and Ors
- The Director, Icar v. Sh Vinod Poddar
- Director, Icar v. Sh Balwan Singh
- Director Iari v. Sh Satya Prakash
- Director Iari v. Sh Ram Manohar Mehto and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Brij Kishore and Ors
- Director, Iari v. Surender Pal and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh Nagender Paswan and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh Daya Nand and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Kamal Paswan and Ors
- Director, Indian Agriculture Research Institute v. Sh. Kailash Kapar and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Nissar Ahmed and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh Navin Kumar and Ors
- Director Icar v. Sh Arvind Kumar Mahato and Ors
- Director Iari v. Sh Lal Bahadur Sah and Ors
- Director Iari v. Sh Umesh Paswan and Ors
- Director Icar v. Sh Mahesh Chand and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh Dilip Kumar and Ors
- The Director, Icar v. Sh. Nand Kishore Choudhary and Ors
- Director Iari v. Sh Inder Dev Mahato and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh.Vijay Kumar and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh Sanjay Kumar and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Vinod Kumar and Ors
- Director Icar v. Sh Lal Babu and Ors
- Director Icar v. Sh Gulab Babu Mahato and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh K L Paswan and Ors
- Director, Icar v. Sh Kamal Paswan and Ors
- Director, Irai v. Sh Munna Ram and Ors
- Director, Iari v. Sh Ram Chander Shah and Ors
- Governing Body of Guru Harkrishan Public School New Delhi Society & Anr v. Harvinder Kaur Jaggi & Ors
- I.A.R.I v. Om Prakash & Ors
- Dd Gears Employees Union Regd v. Dd Gears Ltd & Ors
- Narender Kumar v. The Mgmt. of M/S Maman Chand R
- D.T.C v. Rameshwar Dayal & Anr
- Rameshwar Dayal Thru L.R'S v. D.T.C
- D.N. Krishnappa v. The Deputy General Manager
- Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Bharat Singh Jhala (Dead) Son of Shri Nathu Singh, Through Legal Heirs & Anr.
- State Bank of India and Another v. Ajay Kumar Sood
- Ranbir Singh v. Sk Roy, Chairman, Life Insurance Corp. of India & Anr.
- M/S Bombay Chemical Industries v. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr.
- Tate of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Smt. Sureshwati
- M/S. Padia Timber Company (P) Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port Trust Through Its Secretary
- The Workmen Through the Convener Fci Labour Federation v. Ravuthar Dawood Naseem
- Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
- The Director Steel Authority of India Ltd.V. Ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union v. Ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union
- Globe Ground India Employees Union v. Lufthansa German Airlines & Anr.
- Chairman and Managing Director,The Fertilizers and Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd. & Anr. v. General Secretary Fact Employees Association & Ors.
- Sunil Kumar Biswas v. Ordinance Factory Board & Ors.
- Dilip Mani Dubey v. M/S Siel Ltd. & Anr.
- Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Dealers Association Bundi v. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Mazdoor Sangh(B.M.S.)
- Management, Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd v. Ghanshyam Sharma
- The Management of Regional Chief Engineer P.H.E.D. Ranchi v. Their Workmen Rep. by District Secretary
- M. L. Singla v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
- K.K. Suresh & Anr. Etc. v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. Etc.
- Paradeep Phosphates Limited v. State of Orissa & Ors.
- Mohd. Ali v. State of H.P. and Others
- Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gwalior
- Kurukshetra University v. Prithvi Singh
- Smt. K. A. Annamma v. The Secretary, Cochin Co-Operative Hospital Society Ltd.
- Mahavir & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- National Securities Depository Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India