Indian Succession Act, 1925 · Chapter III: Of the Execution of Unprivileged Wills
Section 63: Execution of unprivileged wills
Every testator, not being a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged in actual warfare, [or an airman so employed or engaged,] or a mariner at sea, shall execute his will according to the following rules:—
(a) The testator shall sign or shall affix his mark to the will, or it shall be signed by some other person in his presence and by his direction.
(b) The signature or mark of the testator, or the signature of the person signing for him, shall be so placed that it shall appear that it was intended thereby to give effect to the writing as a will.
(c) The will shall be attested by two or more witnesses, each of whom has seen the testator sign or affix his mark to the will or has seen some other person sign the will, in the presence and by the direction of the testator, or has received from the testator a personal acknowledgment of his signature or mark, or of the signature of such other person; and each of the witnesses shall sign the will in the presence of the testator, but it shall not be necessary that more than one witness be present at the same time, and no particular form of attestation shall be necessary.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 63
-
Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr.
I) Whether the impugned documents, i.e., Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Receipt of Consideration and the registered Will, allegedly entered into by K, father of the appellant/ defendant no.1 and…
-
Gurdial Singh (Dead) Through LR v. Jagir Kaur (Dead) and Anr. Etc.
Issue arose as to whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of the courts below and holding the Will was vitiated due to existence of suspicious circumstances, non-mention of the…
-
Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors.
Matter pertains recall of judgment of this Court on the ground that the respondents in the appeals were not served.
-
Gopal Krishan & Ors. v. Daulat Ram & Ors.
Impugned in this appeal is the judgment and order of the High Court dated 26.03.2018 whereby it has been held that the Will, subject matter of controversy, allegedly of one Testator-SR, had not been proved, thereby…
-
Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the Second Appeal filed by the respondents and setting aside the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the Sub-Judge dismissing the suit of the respondents and…
-
Shakti Yezdani & Anr. v. Jayanand Jayant
Whether a nominee of a holder of shares or securities appointed u/s. 109A of the Companies Act, 1956 rea d with the Bye-laws under the Depositories Act, 1996 is entitled to the beneficial ownership of the shares or…
- Derek A C Lobo & Ors. v. Ulric M A Lobo (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
-
Moturu Nalini Kanth v. Gainedi Kaliprasad (Dead,
Suit filed by the appellant (then a minor) through his guardian claiming right and title over the properties of late ‘V’, who as per his claim had adopted him, under a registered Will. Trial Court decreed the suit. High…
- Ashutosh Samanta (D) by Lrs. v. Sm. Ranjan Bala
- Murthy & Ors. v. C. Saradambal & Ors.
- State of Haryana v. Harnam Singh (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- V. Prabhakara v. Basavaraj K. (Dead) by Lr. & Anr.
- V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. & Anr. v. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Kavita Kanwar v. Mrs. Pamela Mehta & Ors.
- Shivakumar & Ors. v. Sharanabasappa & Ors.
- Dhanpat v. Sheo Ram (Deceased) Through Lrs. & Ors.
- Raj Kumari and Others v. Surinder Pal Sharma
- Govindbhai Chhotabhai Patel & Ors. v. Patel Ramanbhai Mathurbhai
- B.N. Firos v. State of Kerala & Ors.
- Om Prakash & Anr. v. Mishri Lal (Dead) Represented by His Lr. Savitri Devi
- Jagdish Chand Sharma v. Narain Singh Saini (Dead) Through His Lrs. & Ors.
- M.B. Ramesh (D) by Lrs. v. K.M. Veeraje Urs (D) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Gopal Swaroop v. Krishna Murari Mangal & Ors.
- Balathandayutham & Anr. v. Ezhilarasan
- Bhag Singh v. Jaskirat Singh & Ors.
- Yumnam Ongbi Tampha Ibemma Devi v. Yumnam Joykumar Singh & Ors.
- Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam & Anr. v. State (Delhi Admn.) & Anr.
- Rur Singh (D) Th. Lrs. & Ors. v. Bachan Kaur
- Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat v. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria & Ors.
- Bharpur Singh & Ors. v. Shamsher Singh
- Babu Singh & Ors. v. Ram Sahai @ Ram Singh
- Anil Kak v. Kumari Sharada Raje & Ors.
- Savithri and Ors. v. Karthyayani Amma and Ors.
- Benga Behera and Anr. v. Braja Kishore Nanda and Ors.
- Adivekka and Ors. v. Hanamavva Kom Venkatesh D by Lrs. and Anr.
- Hardev Singh v. Gurmail Singh (Dead) by Lrs.
- Shanti Devi v. Daropti Devi and Ors.
- B. Venkatamuni v. C.J.Yodhya Ram Singh and Ors.
- Nirmaljit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- Pentakota Satyanarayana and Ors. v. Pentakota Seetharatnam and Ors.
- Sridevi and Ors. v. Jayraja Shetty and Ors.
- Meenakshiammal (Dead) Through Lrs. and Ors. v. Chandrasekaran and Anr.
- Crystal Developers Etc. Etc. v. Smt. Asha Lata Ghosh (Dead) Through Lrs. and Ors., Etc. Etc.
- M. Rangasamy v. Rengammal and Ors.
- Ramabai Padmakar Patil (D) Through Lrs. and Ors. v. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande and Ors.
- Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam
- Madhukar D. Shende v. Tarabai Aba Shedage
- N. Kamalam (Dead) and Anr. v. Ayyasamy and Anr.
- Nagulapati Lakshmamma v. Mupparaju Subbaiah
- Kartar Kaur and Anr. v. Milkho and Ors.
- Mrs. Joyce Primrose Prestor v. Miss Vera Marie Vas and Ors.
- Kashibai W/O Lachiram and Anr. v. Parwatibai W/O Lachiram and Anr.
- Smt. Guro v. Atma Singh and Ors.