Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Section 57: Statement of case by Chief Controlling Revenue-authority to High Court
(1) The Chief Controlling Revenue-authority may state any case referred to it under section 56, sub-section (2), or otherwise coming to its notice, and refer such case, with its own opinion thereon,—
[(a) if it arises in a State, to the High Court for that State;
[(b) if it arises in the Union territory of the Delhi, to the High Court of Delhi;]
* * * * *
[(c) if it arises in the Union territory of the Arunachal Pradesh or Mizoram, to the Gauhati High Court (the High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur and Tripura;)] (d) if it arises in the Union territory of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, to the High Court at Calcutta ;
(e) if it arises in the Union territory of the [Lakshadweep], to the High Court of Kerala;]
[ (ee) if it arises in the Union territory of the Chandigarh, to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana;]
[(f) if it arises in the Union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, to the High Court of Bombay.]
(2) Every such case shall be decided by not less than three Judges of the High Court *** to which it is referred, and in case of difference the opinion of the majority shall prevail.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 57
- M/S. Orissa Textile and Steel Ltd. v. State Oe Orissa and Ors.
- Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd., Etc. v. Board of Revenue, U.P., Etc.
- Madras Refineries Ltd. v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Madras
- Banarsi Das Ahluwalia v. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Delhi
- Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh v. Rai Saheb Sidhnath Mehrotra
- The Member, Board of Revenue v. Arthur Paul Benthall.
- Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Superintendent of Stamps and Maharashtra Sugar Mills Ltd.
- Dr. N. B. Khare v. The State of Delhi