Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XXII: Or Criminal Intimidation, Insult and Annoyance
Section 509: Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Intending to insult a woman's modesty by words, sounds, gestures or showing an object meant to be heard or seen by her, or intruding on her privacy, is punishable with simple imprisonment for up to three years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any words, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, [shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and also with fine].
State amendments to this section
Chhattisgarh After Section 509 of the Penal Code, the following shall be inserted, namely: — 509A. Sexual harassment by relative.—Whoever, being related to a woman through blood, adoption or marriage, and not being her husband, takes the advantage of his proximity and induces, seduces or threatens such woman with intent to insult her modesty by word, gesture or act shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to five years and shall also liable to fine. 509B. Sexual harassment by electronic mode.—Whoever, by means of telecommunication device or by any other electronic mode including internet, makes creates, solicits or initiates the transmission of any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image or other communication, which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent with intent to harass or cause or having knowledge that it would harass or cause annoyance or mental agony to a woman shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but may extend to two years and shall also be liable to fine. [Vide Chhattisgarh Act 25 of 2015, sec. 6].
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 509
-
Dr. Sohail Malik v. Union of India & Anr.
Issue arose whether the Internal Complaints Committee-ICC constituted in one department of the Central Government has the jurisdiction to entertain a complaint of sexual harassment under the POSH Act against an employee…
-
R. Rajendran v. Kamar Nisha and Others
The High Court directed the appellant to appear before a Hospital for collection of blood samples for DNA profiling. Whether the High Court was justified in directing the appellant to undergo DNA testing.
-
Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif v. The State of Maharashtra and Others
The complaint of the appellant before the High Court was that the police officers concerned had failed in their duty by not registering a First Information Report apropos the attack and assault on him by four…
-
Imran Pratapgadhi v. State Of Gujarat and Anr.
Whether on facts, the offences punishable under Sections 196, 197, 299 and 302 of the BNS as alleged, were made out against the appellant, a Member of Rajya Sabha; whether the High Court erred in rejecting the petition…
-
Firoz Khan Akbarkhan v. The State of Maharashtra
Whether the concurrent conviction of the appellant u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 is justified; whether he is entitled to remission of sentence.
-
Gyanendra Singh @ Raja Singh v. State of U.P.
Whether the conviction of the appellant ought to have been recorded under the IPC or whether the provisions of the Special law, i.e., Section 42A of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, would prevail…
-
Suneeti Toteja v. State of U.P. & Another
Whether, in light of the facts and circumstances of this case and the position of law apropos to the sanction for prosecution, the High Court ought to have exercised its powers u/s.482 of the CrPC to quash the…
-
Madhushree Datta v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether, based on the materials on record, prima facie, ingredients of the offences u/ss.323, 504, 506, 509, and 511 IPC are made out; whether the chargesheet and the related criminal proceedings…
-
Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda
Issue arose whether the petitioner-wife is entitled to the transfer of the divorce petition; and whether this Court, upon the application filed by the respondent-husband, can exercise its powers u/Art. 142(1) of the…
- Anil Kumar Thakur & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Raj Kumar Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Prabha Aggarwal v. State NCT of Delhi Anr
- Jasdeep Singh & Anr v. State & Anr
-
Om Prakash Yadav v. Niranjan Kumar Upadhyay & Ors.
Issue arose as regards whether in the absence of the grant of sanction for prosecution u/s.197 CrPC, the CJM, Firozabad could have taken cognizance of the charge sheets against the respondents; and whether the offence…
- Keshav Kapoor & Ors v. State Through Sho of Ps Sarita Vihar & Anr
- Amrish Kumar Mishra & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Tushar Tamang v. State N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr
- Nrupalbhai Narendrabhai Shah v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Nrupalbhai Narendrabhai Shah v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Varun Soneja & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
-
Ramji Lal Bairwa & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Issue arose as regards whether a third party to a criminal proceeding got locus standi to challenge the order quashing the FIR lodged against the teacher by the father of the minor victim under the Penal Code, POCSO Act…
-
Directorate of Enforcement v. Bibhu Prasad Acharya, etc.
The appellant filed complaints against the respondents and others u/s.44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Special Court took cognizance of the complaints and issued summons to the respondents…
- Sanjeev Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Sanjeev Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Nitin Saxena v. Government of NCT of Delhi Anr
- Xx v. State of Gnct of Delhi Through Sho Ps New Ashok Nagar Delhi & Ors
- Girish Kumar Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Vikas Chhillar & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Kailash Chand & Ors v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
- V v. State & Anr
- Kamal Kishore Sharma & Anr v. State Through Sho Ps Rajouri Garden and Ors
- Aayush Singhal & Ors v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Anil Shandilya v. State G.N.C.T of Delhi
- Shantanu Shandilya v. State G.N.C.T of Delhi and Anr
- Geeta Gandhi v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr
- Jitender Kumar @ Paltu v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Kuldeep Kumar v. State of Delhi NCT & Anr
- I v. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
- The State (Gnct of Delhi) v. Dharambir Singh
- Ms. Xxxx v. The State & Anr
- Dilip Puri v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
- Arvind Kejriwal & Ors v. State & Anr
- Anjali and Other v. Union of India and Others
- Vikas Gautam & Anr v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Vikshit Tomar v. District & Sessions Judge & Anr
- Sh. Vikash Kumar & Anr v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
- Prateek & Ors v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Ms. Kt v. Gnct of Delhi & Anr
- Saanvi Malu v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Court on Its Own Motion v. Sanjay Rathod (Advocate)
- Renu Bala & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
- H K Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Riddhi Siddhi Associates v. National Highways Authority of India & Ors
- Praveen Mohammad v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Danish & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Gulshan Verma v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors
- Hans Raj v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Abhishek Pal and Others v. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Another
- Ravi Shankar Alias Tuntun & Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Abhishek Pal and Others v. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Another
- Krishananad Dubey & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Lakshay Jaiswal v. State(Nct of Delhi) and Anr
- Lakshay Jaiswal v. State(Nct of Delhi) and Anr
- Abhimanyu Kumar v. The State of NCT Delhi & Anr
- Santoshanand @ Kavitender Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Vikrant Gupta v. State & Anr
- Pintu Das v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Deepak & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Hari Ram & Ors v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Sukhjot Singh @ Nav Grover & Ors v. State & Ors
- Krishan Gopal Yadav & Ors v. The State Gnct, Delhi & Anr
- Rajan Kumar @ Ashu Chauhan v. State of N.C.T of Delhi
- Babita Jain v. State (Gnct of Delhi)
- Vipul Mehta and Anr v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Aradhana v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- Prabhat Krishna v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors
- Keshav Gautam v. State of Gnctd
- Manoj Nagpal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- State v. Munish Kumar Gaur
-
Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal
When the marriage ceremony had not been performed in accordance with section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, whether registration of such a marriage under section 8 of the 1955 Act would confer any legitimacy to it.
- Veerpal @ Titu v. State
- Rajan Dutta v. The State of NCT of Delhi Through Sho Ps Hazrat Nizamuddin & Anr
- Lakshay Jaiswal v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Bhanu Parthap and Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. & Anr
- Dinesh v. State of Delhi and Anr
- Sh. Sunil v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Ashwani v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Vishal Kumar Karan v. The State Government of NCT of Delhi
- Virender Giri v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Saood Ahmad & Ors v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors
- Manish Beniwal & Ors v. The Goverment of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Hashrat Ali & Ors v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors
-
Apoorva Arora & Anr. Etc. v. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Whether the use of expletives and profane language in the titles and content of the episodes of the web-series ‘College Romance’ constitutes an offence of publication and transmission of obscene and sexually explicit…
- Jitender Sharma & Anr v. The State & Ors
- Nityanand Khatua v. State
- Asit Mukherjee v. State
- Anil Sharma v. State ( NCT of Delhi)
- Harsh Sharma v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Pawan Kumar @ Monu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Yogesh Kumar & Ors v. State (Government Ofnct of Delhi) & Anr