Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of criminal trespass
Section 447: Punishment for criminal trespass
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever commits criminal trespass shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 447
-
State of Jharkhand v. Dr. Nishkant Dubey & Ors.
What are the essential conditions that must be satisfied to attract the provisions of Section 366 of the IPC? What are the essentials to constitute a trespass as criminal trespass? Whether the procedure provided under…
-
Prem Prakash v. Union of India Through
When a person is in judicial custody/custody in another case investigated by the same Investigating Agency, whether the statements recorded (in the present case, the statements dated 03.08.2023, 04.08.2023, 11.08.2023)…
-
Tusharbhai Rajnikantbhai Shah v. Kamal Dayani & Ors.
Accused-petitioner was granted absolute interim protection of anticipatory bail by Supreme Court, until modified or altered upon final disposal of the present SLP which was pending consideration before this Court.…
-
Union of India and Others v. Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal
Appellants, if justified in terminating the services of the respondent on the post of Constable (GD) in the CRPF after conducting a departmental inquiry against him on receiving information that he had deliberately…
-
Pavana Dibbur v. The Directorate of
Whether the offence u/s.120B, IPC included in Paragraph 1 of the Schedule to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, can be treated as a scheduled offence even if the criminal conspiracy alleged is to commit an…
-
Birbal Nath v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors
Whether the High Court was justified in acquitting the accused for the major offences u/ss. 302 and 307 IPC, and convicting them only for the offences u/ss. 147, 148, 323, 324, 325/149 and reducing their sentences to…
- State of West Bengal v. Mitul Kumar Jana
- Government of Tamil Nadu v. R. Thamaraiselvam
- Pulen Phukan & Ors. v. The State of Assam
- Sumitha Pradeep v. Arun Kumar C.K & Anr.
- Md. Jabbar Ali & Ors. v. The State of Assam
- Gali Janardhan Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
- Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
- Narsingh Ispat Ltd v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Banwari Lal and Another
- Krishnamurthy @ Gunodu and Others v. State of Karnataka
- Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.
- Jitul Jentilal Kotecha v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc
- The State of Kerala v. K. Ajith & Ors.
- Sayyed Ayaz Ali v. Prakash G Goyal & Ors.
- Chhota Ahirwar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- M.E. Shivalingamurthy v. Central Bureau of Investigation, Bengaluru
- G H Kanwar Pal Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
- Union of India and Others v. Ramesh Bishnoi
- P Ramesh v. State Rep by Inspector of Police
- Atma Ram & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- Sri Suresh Kumar Goyal and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
- Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association & Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
- Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala
- Usmanganjadambhaivahora v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- Bivash Chandra Debnath @ Bivash D & Others v. State of West Bengal