Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of the receiving of stolen property
Section 412: Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Dishonestly receiving or keeping property one knows or has reason to believe was obtained by dacoity, or receiving stolen property from someone known to belong to a gang of dacoits, is punishable with imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for up to ten years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, the possession whereof he knows or has reason to believe to have been transferred by the commission of dacoity, or dishonestly receives from a person, whom he knows or has reason to believe to belong or to have belonged to a gang of dacoits, property which he knows or has
reason to believe to have been stolen, shall be punished with [imprisonment for life], or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 412
- Irshad Ali v. State NCT of Delhi
- Mohd. Jalaluddin v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Mohd. Wasim @ Bablu v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Furkan v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Abrar@Bale v. State Through Crime Branch Sho
- Vikas v. The State Govt. of NCT Delhi
- Krishna v. Delhi Police & Ors
- State v. Virender @ Billu & Ors
- Himanshu Thakur v. State NCT of Delhi
- Tek Chand v. State N.C.T. of Delhi
- Mohit v. State (Gnct of Delhi)
- Bhawna Grover v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Sohrab v. State Gnct of Delhi
- Radhey Krishan v. State ( NCT of Delhi)
- Dharmender Kumar Alias Chacha v. State
- Naseeb v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Ashraf v. State
- Mohd Sabir & Ors v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
- Hari Om @ Hero v. State of U.P.
- Birbal Choudhary@ Mukhiya Jee v. State of Bihar
- Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- M. Mahendar Kumar v. M. Mani & Ors.
- State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Sankar Ghosh
- Pramod Bhanudas Soundankar v. State of Maharashtra
- Sanichar Sahni v. The State of Bihar
- Sitaram Sao@Mungeri v. State of Jharkhand
- Mahmood and Ors. v. The State of Bihar
- Suraj Pal Etc. Etc. v. State of Haryana
- State of Haryana v. Uttam Alias Cheaku
- Shivappa & Ors. v. State of Mysore