Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of Kidnapping, abduction, slavery and forced labour
Section 367: Kidnapping or abducting in order to subject person to grievous hurt, slavery, etc
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Kidnapping or abducting a person so they may be subjected, or put in danger of being subjected, to grievous hurt, slavery or another's unnatural lust, or knowing this is likely, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to ten years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be subjected, or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being subjected to grievous hurt, or slavery, or to the unnatural lust of any person, or knowing it to be likely that such person will be so subjected or disposed of, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 367
-
Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India & Ors.
Writ petition filed u/Art.32 challenging the continuing validity of the sentence of death against the petitioner, having been affirmed on appeal, declined in review, and followed by the rejection of mercy petitions and…
-
Daljit Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court refusing to quash the complaint, summoning order and order declaring the appellant a proclaimed offender passed by the Magistrate; whether the proclaimed…
-
State of Haryana v. Dharamraj
In instant appeal, the State seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the sole respondent by the Single Judge of the High Court.
- Anant Thanur Karmuse v. The State of
- Rahul v. State of Delhi Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr.
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Lochan Shrivas v. The State of Chhattisgarh
- Dattatraya @ Datta Ambo Rokade v. The State of Maharashtra
- Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. State of Maharashtra
- Ashwani Kumar @ Ashu & Anr. v. State of Punjab
- Vasant Sampat Dupare v. State of Maharashtra
- Ram Deo Prasad v. State of Bihar
- State of U.P. v. Nandu Vishwakarma & Ors.
- Vinod Chaturvedi Etc. Etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Makhan Singh Tarsikka v. The State of Punjab