Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XV: Of Offences Relating to Religion
Section 295: Injuring or defiling place of worship, with intent to insult the religion of any class
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Destroying, damaging or defiling a place of worship or an object held sacred by any class of persons, intending to insult their religion or knowing they are likely to see it as an insult, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to two years, or fine, or both.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever destroys, damages or defiles any place of worship, or any object held sacred by any class of persons with the intention of thereby insulting the religion of any class of persons or with the knowledge
that any class of persons is likely to consider such destruction, damage or defilement as an insult to their religion, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 295
-
Dhirubhai Bhailalbhai Chauhan & Anr. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court qua the appellants; whether in the facts of the case, mere presence of the appellants at the scene of crime, without…
- Alok Kumar v. Harsh Mander & Anr
- Manoj Paul v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Anr
- M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. V. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors
- Romila Thapar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Rajasthan v. Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta
- Sajjan Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Mohd. Aslam @ Bhure v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui Etc. v. Union of India and Ors.
- S. Guin & Others v. Grindlays Bank Ltd.
- Thakur Narwar Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- S. Veerabadran Chettiar v. E.V. Ramaswami Naicker & Others