Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter II: Of the Relevancy of Facts
Section 7: Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Facts that are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue or relevant facts, or show the circumstances in which they happened or gave the opportunity for them, are relevant.
Example: In a murder case, marks on the ground from a struggle near the scene are relevant.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened, or which afforded an opportunity for their occurrence or transaction, are relevant.
Illustrations
(a) The question is, whether A robbed B. The facts that, shortly before the robbery, B went to a fair with money in his possession, and that he showed it, or mentioned the fact that he had it, to third persons, are relevant.
(b) The question is, whether A murdered B. Marks on the ground, produced by a struggle at or near the place where the murder was committed, are relevant facts.
(c) The question is, whether A poisoned B. The state of B’s health before the symptoms ascribed to poison, and habits of B, known to A, which afforded an opportunity for the administration of poison, are relevant facts.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 7
-
Vibhor Garg v. Neha
Issue arose whether the conversation between spouses secretly recorded by one of them could be permitted to be made admissible in evidence; whether in light of the Evidence Act and the Family Courts Act, 1984, a…
- Madan @ Madhu Patekar v. The State of Maharashtra
- State of Haryana v. Krlshan & Anr.
- Dhal Singh Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- Ritesh Sinha v. The State of Utiar Pradesh & Anr.
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru
- Ram Singh & Ors. v. Col. Ram Singh
- Union of India and Ors. v. Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd.
- Shri N. Sri Rama Reddy Etc. v. Suri v. V. Giri
- Yusufalli Esmail Nagree v. The State of Maharashtra