Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter X: Of the Examination of Witnesses
Section 161: Right of adverse party as to writing used to refresh memory
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Any writing used to refresh a witness's memory under the two preceding sections must be produced and shown to the other side if they ask, and they can cross-examine the witness on it.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Any writing referred to under the provisions of the two last preceding sections must be produced and shown to the adverse party if he requires it; such party may, if he pleases, cross-examine the witness thereupon.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 161
-
Shailesh Kumar v. State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand)
What is the goal of investigation and what is the role of investigating officer; Are s.172 CrPC and ss. 145 & 161 of the Evidence Act to be read in consonance with each other; Can a General Diary entry precede the…
- Santosh Devi v. Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital Shahdara Delhi
- Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
- Kukapalli Mohan Rao v. State of A.P.
- Ravi Kumar v. State of Punjab
- Bijoy Singh and Anr. v. State of Bihar
- Shamshul Kanwar v. State of U.P.
- Mukund Lal & Anr. v. Union of India.& Anr.
- Laxminarayan and Another v. Returning Officer and Others