Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter IX: Of Witnesses
Section 133: Accomplice
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 133
- A. Srinivasulu v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
- D. Velayutham v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Salem Town, Chennai
- Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Chandra Prakash v. State of Rajasthan
- C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Balveer @ Balli and Anr.
- Venkatesha v. State of Karnataka
- Shanti Devi v. State of Rajasthan
- Mrinal Das & Ors. v. The State of Tripura
- Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan v. State of Kerala
- State of Maharashtra v. Abu Salem Abdul Kayyam Ansari and Ors.
- Sitaram Sao@Mungeri v. State of Jharkhand
- Francis Stanly@ Stalin v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Thiruvananthapuram
- K. Hashim v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Parmananda Pegu v. State of Assam
- Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- M.O. Shamsudhin v. State of Kerala.
- Suresh Chandra Bahri Etc. Etc. v. State of Bihar
- Rampal Pithwas Rahidass and Ors. v. 'State of Maharashtra Etc.
- Seyaka Perumal, Etc v. State of Tamil Nadu