Income-tax Act, 1961 · Chapter XX: Appeals and Revision · C.—Reference to High Court
Section 256: Statement of case to the High Court
The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 from 1 April 2026. The text is kept here because the judgments below apply it.
In plain words
This section covers the old reference procedure. For orders of the Appellate Tribunal passed before 1st October 1998, the assessee or the Commissioner could ask the Tribunal to refer a question of law to the High Court.
- The application had to be made within sixty days of being served with the Tribunal's order, with a fee if the assessee applied.
- The Tribunal had to draw up a statement of the case and refer it within one hundred and twenty days.
- The Tribunal could allow a further thirty days for sufficient cause.
- If the Tribunal refused because it found no question of law, the party could apply to the High Court within six months, and the High Court could direct the Tribunal to refer the case.
- The High Court answered only questions of law. It did not reassess the facts found by the Tribunal.
- For later orders, the route is a direct appeal to the High Court.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The assessee or the [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner] may, within sixty days of the date upon which he is served with notice of [an order passed before the 1st day of October, 1998, under section 254], by application in the prescribed form, accompanied where the application is made by the assessee by a fee of [two hundred rupees], require the Appellate Tribunal to refer to the High Court any question of law arising out of such order and, subject to the other provisions contained in this section, the Appellate Tribunal shall, within one hundred and twenty days of the receipt of such application, draw up a statement of the case and refer it to the High Court :
Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may, if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the application within the period hereinbefore specified, allow it to be presented within a further period not exceeding thirty days.
(2) If, on an application made under sub-section (1), the Appellate Tribunal refuses to state the case on the ground that no question of law arises, the assessee or the [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner], as the case may be, may, within six months from the date on which he is served with notice of such refusal, apply to the High Court, and the High Court may, if it is not satisfied with the correctness of the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, require the Appellate Tribunal to state the case and to refer it, and on receipt of any such requisition, the Appellate Tribunal shall state the case and refer it accordingly. [(2A) The High Court may admit an application after the expiry of the period of six months referred to in sub-section (2), if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the same within that period.]
(3) Where in the exercise of its powers under sub-section (2), the Appellate Tribunal refuses to state a case which it has been required by the assessee to state, the assessee may, within thirty days from the date on which he receives notice of such refusal, withdraw his application, and, if he does so, the fee paid shall be refunded.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 256
-
(Earlier Known as Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether by way of the circular dated 30.01.2004 the benefits granted under the statutory notification dated 01.04.2003 could have been curtailed by expanding the exclusionary clause; whether crude degummed soyabean oil…
- Raj Pal Singh v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Haryana, Rohtak
- Mahaveer Kumar Jain v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur
- Mis Ganapathy & Co., Bangalore v. The Commissioner, Income Tax Bangalore
- Premier Breweries Ltd., Karnataka v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin
- Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Another
- Commissioner of Customs (Import) v. Stoneman Marble Industries & Ors
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. M/S. Saurashtra Cement Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. J.K. Charitable Trust Kamal Tower, Kanpur
- Pnb Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, New Delhi
- Kerala Road Lines v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin
- Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co.Ltd.
- N. Srinivasa Rao v. Spl. Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act and Ors.
- Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. C.I.T., Kolhapur and Ors.
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sunil J. Kinariwala
- The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin v. Mis. Kesaria Tea Co. Ltd.
- The Income Tax Officer, New Delhi v. Delhi Development Authority
- M/S. Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ernakulam.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin v. Mrs. Grace Collis and Ors.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. M/S Tranvancore Titanium Products Ltd.
- The K.C.P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
- Bharat Earth Movers v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Jabalpur v. Mis. Durga Engineering and Foundry Works
- Commissioner of Income-Tax West Bengal-I, Calcutta v. United Provinces Electric Supply Company
- V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax Etc.
- Rajasthan State Warehocsing Corporation v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- General Insurance Corporation of India v. Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay
- K.R. Patel (Dead) Through L.Rs. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Bharat Carbon and Ribbon Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana v. Om Prakash
- Union of India and Ors. v. M.V. Valliappan and Ors.
- Uco Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal
- The Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Cynamid India Ltd.
- M/S. Surana Steels Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors.
- Orissa State Warehousing Corpn. Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Universal Plast Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta
- Prem Dass v. Income Tax Officer
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar-Ii, Patna. v. Bokaro Steel Ltd. Bokaro
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. G. Narshimhan (Died) by Heirs
- M/S R.B. Shreeram Religious and Charitable Trust v. The Commissioner of Income-Tax Vidarbha, Nagpur
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal v. H.H. Maharani Usha Devi
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S Hindustan Times Ltd. New Delhi
- Commissioner of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu v. S. Balasubramanian
- Bharat Commerce and Industries Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-Ii
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow v. U.P. Forest Corporation
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka v. M/S Bedi and Company Pvt. Ltd.
- S. Rm. M.Ct. M. Tiruppani Trust v. The Commissioner of Income Tax
- Rashik Lal and Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa
- P. Sarada v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)
- The Commissioner of Income Tax (Cntl.), Ludhiana v. M/S Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana Etc. Etc.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Stepwell Industries Ltd. Etc. Etc.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar v. Tattan Trust Amritsar Etc.
- Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Tamil,Nadu I, Madras
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. M/S. Banque Nationale De-Paris
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
- Sh. S.P. Jaiswal Etc. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax
- The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow v. Maharani Raj Laxmi Devi
- M/S. Jonas Woodhead and Sons Ltd., Madras v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
- Mis. Ashok Leyland Ltd. Madras v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
- East India Hotels Ltd. Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta
- M/S Sri Venkata Satya Narayana Rice Mill Contractors Co. v. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Andhra Pradesh- II
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar v. M/S Shiv Prakash Janak Raj and Co. Pvt. Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai v. M/S. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd.
- M/S. Sundaram Clayton Ltd. Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Smith Kline and French (India) Ltd. Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- M/S. Waterfall Estates Ltd., Madras v. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu I, Madras
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. Smt. R. Sharadamma
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Etc v. M/S. Mafatlal Gangabhai and Co. (P) Ltd. Etc.
- Calcutta State Transport Corporation v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
- The Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S. Narang Dairy Products
- Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. Jyoti Ltd.
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala v. The Kilkotagiri Tea and Coffee Estate Co. Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-Ii), Calcutta v. M/S. Duncan Brothers and Co. Ltd., Calcutta
- Commissioner of Income-Tax, Orissa v. M/S. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.
- Bihari Lal Jaiswal v. The Commissioner of Income Tax
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut, Etc. Etc v. M/S. Virmani Industries Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc.
- Gosar Family Trust, Jamnagar Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutia v. Bijoy Kumar Almal
- The Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax, Andhra Pradesh v. M/S. Degaon Ganga Reddy G. Ramakrishna and Co. and Ors.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad v. M/S. P.J. Chemicals Ltd. Etc.
- Builders Associations of India v. Union of India and Ors.
- The C.L.T., Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad v. The Ahmedabad Cotton Mfg. Co. Ltd. & Ors.
- Smt. Sarifabibi Mohmed Ibrahim and Ors. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat
- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa v. N.C. Budharaja & Company and Anr. Etc. Etc.
- Varkey Chacko v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Bharat Beedi Works (Private) Limited and Anr. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax
- M.S.P Nadar Sons, Virudhu Nagar v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Madras
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras v. G.R. Karthikeyan, Coimbatore
- Commissioner of Income Tax. Bombay v. Indian Engineering and Commercial Corpn. Pvt. Ltd.
- Salem Cooperative Central Bank Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
- Prakash Cotion Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Bombay
- Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana Etc. Etc. v. Amritsar Transport Company Private Limited and Anr.
- Chhathu Ram and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar, Patna and Ors.
- Standard Triumph Motor Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
- Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.
- C.I.T., Bombay v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
- Continental Construction Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central-I
- Indian Tube Co. (P) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Calcutta