Income-tax Act, 1961 · Chapter XIV: Procedure for Assessment
Section 153: Time limit for completion of assessments, reassessments and recomputation
The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 from 1 April 2026. The text is kept here because the judgments below apply it.
In plain words
This section sets time limits for completing assessments. An assessment under section 143 or section 144 must be made within twenty-one months from the end of the assessment year, with shorter limits of eighteen months and twelve months for later years.
- A reassessment under section 147 must be made within nine months from the end of the financial year in which the notice under section 148 was served, or twelve months for notices served on or after 1st April, 2019.
- A fresh assessment after an order under section 254, section 263 or section 264 must be made within the period the section sets.
- Certain periods, such as stays by a court, are excluded when computing these limits.
- An assessment made after the time limit is invalid.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) No order of assessment shall be made under section 143 or section 144 at any time after the expiry of twenty-one months from the end of the assessment year in which the income was first assessable: [Provided that in respect of an order of assessment relating to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 2018, the provisions of this sub-section shall have effect, as if for the words —twenty-one months‖, the words —eighteen months‖ had been substituted:
Provided further that in respect of an order of assessment relating to the assessment year commencing on or after the 1st day of April, 2019, the provisions of this sub-section shall have effect, as if for the words —twenty-one months‖, the words —twelve months‖ had been substituted.]
(2) No order of assessment, reassessment or recomputation shall be made under section 147 after the expiry of nine months from the end of the financial year in which the notice under section 148 was served: [Provided that where the notice under section 148 is served on or after the 1st day of April, 2019, the provisions of this sub-section shall have effect, as if for the words —nine months‖, the words —twelve months‖ had been substituted.]
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), an order of fresh assessment in pursuance of an order under section 254 or section 263 or section 264, setting aside or cancelling an assessment, may be made at any time before the expiry of nine months from the end of the financial year in which the order under section 254 is received by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or, as the case may be, the order under section 263 or section 264 is passed by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner: [Provided that where the order under section 254 is received by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or, as the case may be, the order under section 263 or section 264 is passed by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner on or after the 1st day of April, 2019, the provisions of this sub-section shall have effect, as if for the words —nine months‖, the words —twelve months‖ had been substituted.]
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1), (2) and (3), where a reference under sub-section (1) of section 92CA is made during the course of the proceeding for the assessment or reassessment, the period available for completion of assessment or reassessment, as the case may be, under the said sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) shall be extended by twelve months.
(5) Where effect to an order under section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263 or section 264 is to be given by the Assessing Officer, wholly or partly, otherwise than by making a fresh assessment or reassessment, such effect shall be given within a period of three months from the end of the month in which order under section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 is received by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as the case may be, the order under section 263 or section 264 is passed by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner:
Provided that where it is not possible for the Assessing Officer to give effect to such order within the aforesaid period, for reasons beyond his control, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner on receipt of such request in writing from the Assessing Officer, if satisfied, may allow an additional period of six months to give effect to the order:
[Provided further that where an order under section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263 or section 264 requires verification of any issue by way of submission of anydocument by the assessee or any other person or where an opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the assessee, the order giving effect to the said order under section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263 or section 264 shall be made within the time specifiedin sub-section (3).]
(6) Nothing contained in sub-sections (1) and (2) shall apply to the following classes of assessments, reassessments and recomputation which may, subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (5), be completed—
(i) where the assessment, reassessment or recomputation is made on the assessee or any person in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in an order under section 250, section 254, section 260, section 262, section 263, or section 264 or in an order of any court in a proceeding otherwise than by way of appeal or reference under this Act, on or before the expiry of twelve months from the end of the month in which such order is received or passed by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as the case may be; or
(ii) where, in the case of a firm, an assessment is made on a partner of the firm in consequence of an assessment made on the firm under section 147, on or before the expiry of twelve months from the end of the month in which the assessment order in the case of the firm is passed.
(7) Where effect to any order, finding or direction referred to in sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) is to be given by the Assessing Officer, within the time specified in the said sub-sections, and such order has been received or passed, as the case may be, by the income-tax authority specified therein before the 1st day of June, 2016, the Assessing Officer shall give effect to such order, finding or direction, or assess, reassess or recompute the income of the assessee, on or before the 31st day of March, 2017.
(8) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, sub-section (2) of section 153A or sub-section (1) of section 153B, the order of assessment or reassessment, relating to any assessment year, which stands revived under sub-section (2) of section 153A, shall be made within a period of one year from the end of the month of such revival or within the period specified in this section or sub-section (1) ofsection 153B, whichever is later.
(9) The provisions of this section as they stood immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2016, shall apply to and in relation to any order of assessment, reassessment or recomputation made before the 1st day of June, 2016: [Provided that where a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142 or sub-section (2) of section 143 or section 148 has been issued prior to the 1st day of June, 2016 and the assessment or reassessment has not been completed by such date due to exclusion of time referred to in Explanation 1, such assessment or reassessment shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of this section as it stood immediately before its substitution by the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016).]
Explanation 1.—For the purposes of this section, in computing the period of limitation—
(i) the time taken in reopening the whole or any part of the proceeding or in giving an opportunity to the assessee to be re-heard under the proviso to section 129; or
(ii) the period during which the assessment proceeding is stayed by an order or injunction of any court; or
(iii) the period commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer intimates the Central Government or the prescribed authority, the contravention of the provisions of clause (21) or clause
(22B) or clause (23A) or clause (23B) or sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10, under clause (i) of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 143 and ending with the date on which the copy of the order withdrawing the approval or rescinding the notification, as the case may be, under those clauses is received by the Assessing Officer; or
(iv) the period commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer directs the assessee to get his accounts audited under sub-section (2A) of section 142 and—
(a) ending with the last date on which the assessee is required to furnish a report of such audit under that sub-section; or
(b) where such direction is challenged before a court, ending with the date on which the order setting aside such direction is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner; or
(v) the period commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer makes a reference to the Valuation Officer under sub-section (1) of section 142A and ending with the date on which the report of the Valuation Officer is received by the Assessing Officer; or
(vi) the period (not exceeding sixty days) commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer received the declaration under sub-section (1) of section 158A and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (3) of that section is made by him; or
(vii) in a case where an application made before the Income-tax Settlement Commission is rejected by it or is not allowed to be proceeded with by it, the period commencing from the date on which an application is made before the Settlement Commission under section 245C and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or
(viii) the period commencing from the date on which an application is made before the Authority for Advance Rulings under sub-section (1) of section 245Q and ending with the date on which the order rejecting the application is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (3) of section 245R; or
(ix) the period commencing from the date on which an application is made before the Authority for Advance Rulings under sub-section (1) of section 245Q and ending with the date on which the advance ruling pronounced by it is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (7) of section 245R; or
(x) the period commencing from the date on which a reference or first of the references for exchange of information is made by an authority competent under an agreement referred to in section 90 or section 90A and ending with the date on which the information requested is last received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or a period of one year, whichever is less; or
(xi) the period commencing from the date on which a reference for declaration of an arrangement to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (1) of section 144BA and ending on the date on which a direction under sub-section (3) or sub-section (6) or an order under sub-section (5) of the said section is received by the Assessing Officer, shall be excluded:
Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in sub-sections (1), (2), (3) and sub-section (8) available to the Assessing Officer for making an order of assessment, reassessment or recomputation, as the case may be, is less than sixty days, such remaining period shall be extended to sixty days and the aforesaid period of limitation shall be deemed to be extended accordingly:
Provided further that where the period available to the Transfer Pricing Officer is extended to sixty days in accordance with the proviso to sub-section (3A) of section 92CA and the period of limitation available to the Assessing Officer for making an order of assessment, reassessment or recomputation, as the case may be, is less than sixty days, such remaining period shall be extended to sixty days and the aforesaid period of limitation shall be deemed to be extended accordingly:
Provided also that where a proceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section 245HA, the period of limitation available under this section to the Assessing Officer for making an order of assessment, reassessment or recomputation, as the case may be, shall, after the exclusion of the period under sub-section (4) of section 245HA, be not less than one year; and where such period of limitation is less than one year, it shall be deemed to have been extended to one year; and for the purposes of determining the period of limitation under sections 149,*** 154, 155 and 158BE and for the purposes of payment of interest under section 244A, this proviso shall also apply accordingly.
Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this section, where, by an order referred to in clause (i) of sub-section (6),—
(a) any income is excluded from the total income of the assessee for an assessment year, then, an assessment of such income for another assessment year shall, for the purposes of section 150 and this section, be deemed to be one made in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in the said order; or
(b) any income is excluded from the total income of one person and held to be the income of another person, then, an assessment of such income on such other person shall, for the purposes of section 150 and this section, be deemed to be one made in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in the said order, if such other person was given an opportunity of being heard before the said order was passed.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 153
-
& Others v. Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Ltd. Etc.
The present matter raised important questions of law relating to interpretation and interplay between Section 144C and Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The question for consideration was on the applicability…
- Microsoft India R and D Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 & Anr
- Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr
- M/S Microsoft India R and D Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4 & Anr
- Karl Storz Endoscopy India Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi & Anr
- Jcb India Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi & Anr
- Swarovski India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 22.2
- M/S Microsoft India R and D Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4 & Anr
- Microsoft India (R and D) Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 4 & Anr
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Sumitomo Corporation India (P) Ltd
- Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr
- Contata Solutions Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi & Ors
- Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commssioner of Income Tax & Anr
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Wickwood Development Ltd
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Wickwood Development Ltd
- Ramtech Consulting v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
- At Kearney India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors
- Swarovski India Private Limited v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Osd
- Swarovski India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 22-2
- Swarovski India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 22.2
- Aditya Talwar v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-19,
- Axalta Coating Systems India Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, -Earlier Known As National E-Assessment Centre
- Telstra India Private Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors
- M/S Microsoft India (R and D) Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4 & Anr
- Softwareone India Pvt. Ltd v. National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi
- Smart Cube India Pvt Ltd v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
- Smart Cube India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 22(2)
- Arun Kumar Gurjar v. Central Buraeu of Investigation
- The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Qualcomm Incorporated
- Commissioner of Trade and Taxes and Ors. v. Mis Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat Central v. Saurasthra Cement & Chem. Industries Ltd.
- Arun Kumar Aggarwal v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
- R. Dalmia v. Commissioner of Income Tax
- Barendra Prasad Ray & Ors. v. The Income-Tax Officer 'A' Ward Foreign Section and Ors.
- Grindlays Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, H Ward Companies, District-Iv, Calcutta and Ors.
- Rajinder Nath Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi