Income-tax Act, 1961 · Chapter XIII: Income-Tax Authorities · B.—Jurisdiction
Section 127: Power to transfer cases
The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 from 1 April 2026. The text is kept here because the judgments below apply it.
In plain words
Senior income tax authorities may transfer a case from one Assessing Officer to another, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard wherever possible and recording reasons.
- If both officers are under the same senior authority, that authority passes the order.
- If they are under different authorities who agree, the authority from whose jurisdiction the case moves passes the order; if they disagree, the Board or an authorised officer decides.
- No hearing is needed for a transfer within the same city or locality.
- Courts insist on recorded reasons because a transfer can cause real hardship to the assessee.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The [Principal Director General or Director General] or [Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner] may, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter, wherever it is possible to do so, and after recording his reasons for doing so, transfer any case from one or more Assessing Officers subordinate to him (whether with or without concurrent jurisdiction) to any other Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers (whether with or without concurrent jurisdiction) also subordinate to him.
(2) Where the Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers from whom the case is to be transferred and the Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers to whom the case is to be transferred are not subordinate to the same [Principal Director General or Director General] or [Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner],—
(a) where the [Principal Director General or Director General] or [Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner] to whom such
Assessing Officers are subordinate are in agreement, then the [Principal Director General or Director General] or [Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner] from whose jurisdiction the case is to be transferred may, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter, wherever it is possible to do so, and after recording his reasons for doing so, pass the order;
(b) where the [Principal Directors General or Directors General] or [Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner] aforesaid are not in agreement, the order transferring the case may, similarly, be passed by the Board or any such [Principal Director General or Director General] or [Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commissioner or Commissioner] as the Board may, by notification in the Official Gazette, authorise in this behalf.
(3) Nothing in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be deemed to require any such opportunity to be given where the transfer is from any Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers (whether with or without concurrent jurisdiction) to any other Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers (whether with or without concurrent jurisdiction) and the offices of all such officers are situated in the same city, locality or place.
(4) The transfer of a case under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) may be made at any stage of the proceedings, and shall not render necessary the re-issue of any notice already issued by the Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers from whom the case is transferred.]
Explanation.—In section 120 and this section, the word —case‖, in relation to any person whose name is specified in any order or direction issued thereunder, means all proceedings under this Act in respect of any year which may be pending on the date of such order or direction or which may have been completed on or before such date, and includes also all proceedings under this Act which may be commenced after the date of such order or direction in respect of any year.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 127
- Raj Sheela Growth Fund (P) Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 21(1), Delhi
- Dollar Gulati v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors
- Priyanka Gandhi Vadra v. Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 12 & Ors
- Rajiv Gandhi Foundation v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors
- Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors
- Young Indian v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors
- Rahul Gandhi v. Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 12 & Ors
- Aam Aadmi Party v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors
- Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Trust v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors
- Sonia Gandhi v. Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 12 & Ors
- Jawahar Bhawan Trust v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) & Ors
- M/S Super Malls Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 8, New Delhi
- Biswanath Bhattacharya v. Union of India & Others
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S. Greenworld Corporation, Parwanoo
- K.P. Mohammed Salim v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Cochin
- Management of M/S M.S. Nally Bharat Engg. Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- Ajantha Industries and Ors v. Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi & Others
- Kashiram Agarwala v. Union of India and Others