General Clauses Act, 1897
Section 10: Computation of time
(1) Where, by any [Central Act] or Regulation made after the commencement of this Act, any act or proceeding is directed or allowed to be done or taken in any Court or office on a certain day or within a prescribed period, then, if the Court or office is closed on that day or the last day of the prescribed period, the act or proceeding shall be considered as done or taken in due time if it is done or taken on the next day afterwards on which the Court or office is open:
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any act or proceeding to which the 2Indian Limitation Act, 1877 (15 of 1877), applies.
(2) This section applies also to all [Central Acts] and Regulations made on or after the fourteenth day of January, 1887.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 10
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the…
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to…
-
M/S Om Gurusai Construction Company v. M/S V.N. Reddy & Ors
Under Clause 2.22.0 (ix) of tender conditions, the appellant was to furnish the additional performance secur ity within a period of two working days and this duration of two days was not to b e relaxed under any…
- Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita v. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. (Wil)
- Enforcement Directorate, Government of India v. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr. Etc
- Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority, Faizabad v. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey & Ors.
- N. Rajendran v. S. Valli
- Sridevi Datla v. Union of India and Ors.
- Sagufa Ahmed & Ors. v. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
- Randhir Kaur v. Prithvi Pal Singh & Ors.
- Ravi Prakash Singh @Arvind Singh v. State of Bihar
- Mohd. Ayub v. State of U.P. and Others
- Tarun Prasad Chatterjee v. Dinanath Sharma
- Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad and Ors.
- Mohd. Ali v. Azad Mohd.
- Lachman Das Arora v. Ganeshi Lal and Ors
- Manohar Joshi v. Nitin Bhaurao Patil and Anr.
- Sh. Suryakant Venkatarao Mahadik v. Smt. Saroj Sandesh Naik (Bhosale)
- Ramakant Mayekar Etc. Etc. v. Smt. Celine D Silva
- Simhadri Satya Narayana Rao v. M. Budda Prasad and Ors.