Customs Act, 1962 · Chapter XVI: Offences and Prosecutions
Section 135: Evasion of duty or prohibitions
[(1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person—
(a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods; or
(b) acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harbouring, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 111 or Section 113, as the case may be; or
(c) attempts to export any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 113; or
(d) fraudulently avails of or attempts to avail of drawback or any exemption from duty provided under this Act in connection with [export of goods; or]
[(e) obtains an instrument from any authority by fraud, collusion, willful misstatement or suppression of facts and such instrument has been utilised by such person or any other person,],
he shall be punishable,—
(i) in the case of an offence relating to,—
(A) any goods the market price of which exceeds one crore of rupees; or
(B) the evasion or attempted evasion of duty exceeding [fifty lakh] of rupees; or
(C) such categories of prohibited goods as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify; or
(D) fraudulently availing of or attempting to avail of drawback or any exemption from duty referred to in clause (d), if the amount of drawback or exemption from duty exceeds [fifty lakh] [of rupees; or] with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine:
[(E) obtaining an instrument from any authority by fraud, collusion, willful misstatement or suppression of facts and such instrument has been utilised by any person, where the duty relatable to utilisation of the instrument exceeds fifty lakh rupees.]
Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court, such imprisonment shall not be for less than one year; (ii) in any other case, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.]
[(2) If any person convicted of an offence under this section or under sub-section (1) of section 136 is again convicted of an offence under this section, then, he shall be punishable for the second and for every subsequent offence with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine:
Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court such imprisonment shall not be for less than [one year].
(3) For the purposes of sub-sections (1) and (2), the following shall not be considered as special and adequate reasons for awarding a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than [one year], namely:—
(i) the fact that the accused has been convicted for the first time for an offence under this Act;
(ii) the fact that in any proceeding under this Act, other than a prosecution, the accused has been ordered to pay a penalty or the goods which are the subject matter of such proceedings have been ordered to be confiscated or any other action has been taken against him for the same act which constitutes the offence;
(iii) the fact that the accused was not the principal offender and was acting merely as a carrier of goods or otherwise was a secondary party to the commission of the offence;
(iv) the age of the accused.]
[Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, the expression "instrument" shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in the Explanation 1 to section 28AAA.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 135
-
Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India and Others
Challenge to the constitutional validity and the right of the authorized officers to arrest under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act).
-
Mohd Abaad Ali & Anr. v. Directorate of Revenue
Whether benefit of s.5 r/w. ss. 2 and 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be availed in an appeal against acquittal.
-
Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. M/S Ganpati
Whether the tribunal was justified in holding that enhancement of value of the imported goods and the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on the noticee-respondents could not be sustained and consequently…
- Yamal Manojbhai v. Union of India & Ors.
- The Commissioner of Income Tax Jaipur v. Prakash
- Mohd Zahid v. State Through Ncb
- A.T. Mydeen and Another v. The Assistant Commissioner, Customs Department
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Union of India 2. Joint Secretary (Cofeposa), Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance v. Dimple Happy Dhakad
- Department of Customs v. Sharad Gandhi
- The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
- Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
- State of Jharkhand Through Sp, CBI v. Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Y Aday
- R.R. Parekh v. Hlgh Court of Gujarat & Anr.
- Surinder Singh v. State of Haryana
- Ahmed Shah Khan Durrani @ A.S. Mubarak v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Maharashtra v. Fazal Rehman Abdul
- Ritesh Sinha v. The State of Utiar Pradesh & Anr.
- Tara Chand & Ors. v. Gram Panchayat Jhupa Khurd & Ors.
- Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- Dropti Devi & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Om Prakash & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Vimal Kumar Surana and Another
- Jyoti Harshad Mehta & Ors. v. The Custodian & Ors.
- Gurcharan Singh v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
- Union of India v. Anil Chanana & Another
- Rajesh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
- Lt. Governor, NCT and Ors . v. Ved Prakash @ Vedu
- Sunila Jain v. Union of India and Anr.
- Balram Kumawat v. Union of India & Ors.
- Lalita Jalan and Anr. v. Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- Maliyakkal Abdul Azeez v. Assistant Collector, Kerala and Anr.
- Union of India and Anr. v. Venkateshan S. and Anr.
- Chowdarapu Raghunandan v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- V.C. Mohan v. Union of India and Ors.
- Gulam Hussain Shaikh Chougule v. S. Reynolds, Suptd. of Customs, Marmgoa
- The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Rajamundry v. Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. and Ors.
- Ahamed Nassar v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- K.I. Pavunny v. Assistant Collector (Head Quarter), Central Excise Collectorate, Cochin
- Devchand Kalyan Tandel v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- The State of Gujarat v. Gadhvi Rambhai Nathabhai and Ors. Etc.
- Bhanabhai Khalpabhai v. The Collector of Customs and Anr.
- Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan and Anr.