Customs Act, 1962 · Chapter XIV: Confiscation of Goods and Conveyances and Imposition of Penalties
Section 125: Option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation
(1) Whenever confiscation of any goods is authorised by this Act, the officer adjudging it may, in the case of any goods, the importation or exportation whereof is prohibited under this Act or under any other law for the time being in force, and shall, in the case of any other goods, give to the owner of the goods [or, where such owner is not known, the person from whose possession or custody such goods have been seized,] an option to pay in lieu of confiscation such fine as the said officer thinks fit:
[Provided that where the proceedings are deemed to be concluded under the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 28 or under clause (i) of sub-section (6) of that section in respect of the goods which are not prohibited or restricted, [no such fine shall be imposed]:
Provided further that], without prejudice to the provisions of the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 115, such fine shall not exceed the market price of the goods confiscated, less in the case of imported goods the duty chargeable thereon.
[(2) Where any fine in lieu of confiscation of goods is imposed under sub-section (1), the owner of such goods or the person referred to in sub-section (1), shall, in addition, be liable to any duty and charges payable in respect of such goods.]
[(3) Where the fine imposed under sub-section (1) is not paid within a period of one hundred and twenty days from the date of option given thereunder, such option shall become void, unless an appeal against such order is pending.
Explanation.—For removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that in cases where an order under sub-section (1) has been passed before the date on which the Finance Bill, 2018 receives the assent of the President and no appeal is pending against such order as on that date, the option under said sub-section may be exercised within a period of one hundred and twenty days from the date on which such assent is received.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 125
-
Commissioner of Customs v. M/s Canon India Pvt. Ltd.
Issue arose whether there was an “error apparent on the face of the record” for the purpose of entertaining the review petition; whether law laid down in Canon India’s case as regards the power of the DRI to issue show…
-
M/s Navayuga Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
(i) Whether there is a liability to pay customs duty when the confiscated goods are redeemed after payment of fine under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962; (ii) Whether, the liability to pay such duty will include…
- Union of India & Ors. v. M/S. Raj Grow Impex Llp & Ors.
- Indusind Media & Communications Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi
- Department of Customs v. Sharad Gandhi
- M/S. Dr. Reddy'S Laboratories v. Commissioner of Customs
- Fortis Hospital Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Import
- Commissioner of Customs (Import) v. Stoneman Marble Industries & Ors
- Collector of Customs, Bombay v. M/S. Elephanta Oil and Industries Ltd., Bombay
- Commissioner of Customs (Import) Mumbai v. M/S. Jagdish Cancer and Research Centre
- Sun Export Corporation and Anr. v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
- Navin Chemicals Mfg. and Trading Co. Limited v. Collector of Customs
- Jain Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Akbar Badrudin Jiwani v. Collector of Customs, Bombay
- Madan Lal Anand Etc. v. Union of India and Ors.
- J.P. Sharma v. Vinod Kumar Jain