Constitution of India · Part XXI: Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions
Article 374: Provisions as to Judges of the Federal Court and proceedings pending in the Federal Court or before His Majesty in Council
In plain words
Judges of the Federal Court in office when the Constitution began became Supreme Court Judges, unless they chose otherwise. Cases pending in the Federal Court moved to the Supreme Court, and Federal Court judgments have the same effect as Supreme Court judgments.
- Orders of His Majesty in Council on appeals from India, made after the start under laws authorising them, take effect as Supreme Court orders.
- Appeals pending before the Privy Council authorities of Part B States were transferred to the Supreme Court.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The Judges of the Federal Court holding office immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall, unless they have elected otherwise, become on such commencement the Judges of the Supreme Court and shall thereupon be entitled to such salaries and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as are provided for under article 125 in respect of the Judges of the Supreme Court.
(2) All suits, appeals and proceedings, civil or criminal, pending in the Federal Court at the commencement of this Constitution shall stand removed to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the same, and the judgments and orders of the Federal Court delivered or made before the commencement of this Constitution shall have the same force and effect as if they had been delivered or made by the Supreme Court.
(3) Nothing in this Constitution shall operate to invalidate the exercise of jurisdiction by His Majesty in Council to dispose of appeals and petitions from, or in respect of, any judgment, decree or order of any court within the territory of India in so far as the exercise of such jurisdiction is authorised by law, and any order of His Majesty in Council made on any such appeal or petition after the commencement of this Constitution shall for all purposes have effect as if it were an order or decree made by the Supreme Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred on such Court by this Constitution.
(4) On and from the commencement of this Constitution the jurisdiction of the authority functioning as the Privy Council in a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule to entertain and dispose of appeals and petitions from or in respect of any judgment, decree or order of any court within that State shall cease, and all appeals and other proceedings pending before the said authority at such commencement shall be transferred to, and disposed of by, the Supreme Court.
(5) Further provision may be made by Parliament by law to give effect to the provisions of this article.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 374
- In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution v. .
- State of Karnataka by Its Chief Secretary v. State of T. N. by Its Chief Secretary [Dipak Misra, Cji] 829 the State of Karnataka by Its Chief Secretarystate of Tamil Nadu by Its Chief Secretary & Ors.
- The Matter Of: Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal v. -
- Delhi Judicial Service Association Tis Hazari Court, Delhi Etc. Etc. v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- H. H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jiwaji Rao Scindia Bahadur & Ors. v. Union of India
- R.P. Kapur v. Union of India and Anr.
- Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar
- Badrinarayan Singh v. Kamdeo Prasad Singh and Another
- Yellappagouda Shankargouda Patil v. Basangouda Shiddangouda Patil
- Garikapatti Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhury
- Kishan Lal and Another v. Bhanw Ar Lal
- State of Seraikella v. Union of India and Another
- Narhari and Others v. Shankar and Others
- Kapore Chand v. Kadar Unnisa Begum and Others