Constitution of India · Part XV: Elections
Article 324: Superintendence, direction and control of elections to be vested in an Election Commission
In plain words
The superintendence, direction and control of electoral rolls and of all elections to Parliament, State Legislatures and the offices of President and Vice-President are vested in the Election Commission. It consists of the Chief Election Commissioner and any other Election Commissioners the President fixes, all appointed by the President subject to any law of Parliament.
- When other Election Commissioners are appointed, the Chief Election Commissioner acts as Chairman.
- The President can appoint Regional Commissioners, after consulting the Commission, to assist before general elections and Legislative Council elections.
- The Chief Election Commissioner can be removed only like a Supreme Court Judge, and their service conditions cannot be changed to their disadvantage after appointment.
- Other Election Commissioners and Regional Commissioners can be removed only on the Chief Election Commissioner's recommendation.
- The President or Governor must provide the staff the Commission requests.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Read the in-depth explanation, with key Supreme Court rulings ↓
Official text
(1) The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of the electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, all elections to Parliament and to the Legislature of every State and of elections to the offices of President and Vice-President held under this Constitution *** shall be vested in a Commission (referred to in this Constitution as the Election Commission).
(2) The Election Commission shall consist of the Chief Election Commissioner and such number of other Election Commissioners, if any, as the President may from time to time fix and the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners shall, subject to the provisions of any law made in that behalf by Parliament, be made by the President.
(3) When any other Election Commissioner is so appointed the Chief Election Commissioner shall act as the Chairman of the Election Commission.
(4) Before each general election to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assembly of each State, and before the first general election and thereafter before each biennial election to the Legislative Council of each State having such Council, the President may also appoint after consultation with the Election Commission such Regional Commissioners as he may consider necessary to assist the Election Commission in the performance of the functions conferred on the Commission by clause (1).
(5) Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament, the conditions of service and tenure of office of the Election Commissioners and the Regional Commissioners shall be such as the President may by rule determine:
Provided that the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court and the conditions of service of the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment:
Provided further that any other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.
(6) The President, or the Governor *** of a State, shall, when so requested by the Election Commission, make available to the Election Commission or to a Regional Commissioner such staff as may be necessary for the discharge of the functions conferred on the Election Commission by clause (1).
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Understanding this article
Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction and control of electoral rolls and of all elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President in the Election Commission. It also deals with the Commission's composition, the appointment and removal of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners, and Regional Commissioners.
A plenary power, bounded by law
The Commission's power is plenary, and where Parliament or State laws are silent, Article 324 is a reservoir of power for the Commission to act for free and fair elections. But where valid election laws exist, such as the Representation of the People Act, the Commission must act in conformity with them. It cannot override a law. It can fill gaps.
Independence
- The CEC can be removed only like a Supreme Court Judge, and his conditions of service cannot be varied to his disadvantage after appointment (clause 5).
- Other Election Commissioners can be removed only on the CEC's recommendation.
- In a multi-member Commission, the CEC and other Commissioners have equal say, and decisions are taken by majority (T.N. Seshan, 1995).
Appointments
In Anoop Baranwal (2023) a Constitution Bench held that until Parliament made a law, appointments were to be made on the advice of a committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition (or leader of the largest opposition party) and the Chief Justice of India. Parliament then passed the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which replaces the Chief Justice with a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister. Challenges to that Act were pending, and in 2024 the Court refused to stay appointments made under it.
Uses of the reservoir power
- Model Code of Conduct.
- Directions requiring candidates to disclose criminal antecedents, assets and education, after the Supreme Court found voters have a right to know.
- Scheduling elections, including deciding when to hold elections after an Assembly is dissolved.
Key Supreme Court rulings
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner AIR 1978 SC 851
A Constitution Bench held that Article 324 is a plenary provision vesting the whole responsibility for elections in the Commission; where the enacted laws are silent, the Commission can act to ensure a free and fair poll, though it must act fairly.
Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms 2002 INSC 253
Even without amendment of election law, the Commission could direct candidates to disclose their antecedents, because Article 324 is a reservoir of power and plenary in character; the only limitation is a valid law made by the legislature on the subject.
T.N. Seshan v. Union of India 1995 INSC 398
Parliament validly made the Commission multi-member under Article 324(2); the CEC and Election Commissioners share power, with decisions by majority.
Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India 2023 INSC 190
Until Parliament legislates, the CEC and Election Commissioners are to be appointed by the President on the advice of a committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha (or leader of the largest opposition party) and the Chief Justice of India.
Special Reference No. 1 of 2002 2002 INSC 445
Article 174(1), on the six-month gap between sessions, applies to a functioning Assembly, not a dissolved one; scheduling elections after dissolution is in the exclusive domain of the Election Commission under Article 324.
Common mistakes
- Thinking the Commission can override the Representation of the People Act; it fills gaps only.
- Treating the Anoop Baranwal committee as the current law; Parliament's 2023 Act replaced it.
- Forgetting that the CEC has higher removal protection than the other Commissioners.
Read with: Article 325 Constitution, Article 329 Constitution, Article 243K Constitution
Prepared with AI assistance as a study aid. Every ruling listed was checked against the Supreme Court's own judgments on this site, and quoted words appear in those judgments; linked names open the full judgment. Read the judgments themselves before relying on them. Not legal advice.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 324
-
Ajmera Shyam v. Smt. Kova Laxmi & Ors.
Issue arose whether the non-mentioning of the income shown in the income tax return for four financial years in the Form 26 Affidavit and its portrayal as “Nil” by the respondent no.1-returned candidate would amount to…
-
IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of s.6A of the Citizenship Act; does s.6A offend preambular values like fraternity; s.6A, if ultra vires Part II of the Constitution; does s.6A create an unreasonable…
- Govind Yadav v. Union of India & Ors
- Hans Raj Jain v. Election Commision of India
-
Central Information Commission v. D.D.A. & Anr.
Whether the power of general superintendence direction, and management of the Central Information Commission’s affairs under Section 12(4) of the Right to Information Act 2005, includes the authority to constitute…
-
Association for Democratic Reforms v. Election Commission of India and Another
Petitioners sought directions for re-introduction of the paper ballot system; or that the printed slip from the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) machine be given to the voter to verify, and put in the ballot…
- Mount Columbus School & Ors v. Central Borad of Secondary Education
- Lokesh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
-
Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
Matter pertains to applications for stay of selection and appointment of the Election Commissioners.
-
Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The matter pertains to the constitutional validity of the Electoral Bond Scheme which introduced anonymous financial contributions to political parties; as also the constitutional validity of the provisions of the…
-
Areas v. UOI [Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Cji]
Matter pertains to the scope of the Court’s power to issue directions for the grant of proportional representation for the Limboo-Tamang Scheduled Tribes in the House of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of…
-
Union Territory of Ladakh v. Jammu and Kashmir
High Court whether justified in dismissing the appeal filed by appellants and upholding the interim order of Single Judge directing them to notify the symbol allotted to Respondent no.1 (R1) and allow the candidates set…
- Coal India Limited v. Competition Commission
- Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary, Governor of
- Kanimozhi Karunanidhi v. A. Santhana Kumar
- Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India
- Ravi Namboothiri v. K.A. Baiju & Ors
- S. Rukmini Madegowda v. The State Election Commission & Ors
- Brajesh Singh v. Sunil Arora & Ors.
- Chief Election Commissioner of India v. M.R Vijayabhaskar & Ors.
- State of Goa & Anr. v. Fouziya Imtiaz Shaikh & Anr.
- Laxmibai v. The Collector, Nanded & Ors.
- Satish Ukey v. Devendra Gangadharrao Fadnavis and Anr.
- Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board v. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. & Ors.
- Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India
- Edapaddi K. Palaniswami v. Dhinakaran & Ors.
- Public Interest Foundation & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Shailesh Manubhai Parmar v. Election Commission of India Through the Chief Election Commissioner & Ors.
- Pramod Laxman Gudadhe v. Election Commission of India and Ors.
- Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary S. N. Shukla & Another v. Union of India Through Its Secretary & Others
- Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary S. N. Shukla v. Union of India & Others Writ Petition (C) No. 784 of 2015 February 16, 2018
- Rajbala & Others v. State of Haryana & Others
- Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Another v. Union of India
- Krishnamoorthy v. Sivakumar & Ors.
- Manoj Narula v. Union of India
- Kisan Shankar Kathore v. Arun Dattatray Sawant & Ors
- Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar & Ors.
- Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India & Ors.
- People'S Union for Civil Liberties & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India & Anr.
- S. Subramaniam Balaji v. The Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- Shambhu Prasad Sharma v. Shri Charandas Mahant & Ors.
- Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam & Anr. v. The Election Commission of India
- Oriental Bank of Commerce & Anr. v. R.K. Uppal
- Pratap Chandra Mehta v. State Bar Council of M.P. & Ors.
- Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam and Anr. v. The Election Commission of India
- Election Commission of India v. Teleangana Rastra Samithi & Anr.
- B.P. Singhal v. Union of India and Anr.
- Laxmi Kant Bajpai v. Hazi Yaqoob & Ors.
- People'S Union for Civil Liberties and Another v. Union of India and Another
- Subramanian Swamy v. Election Commission of India Through Its Secretary
- Election Commission of India v. St. Marys School and Ors.
- Union of India and Anr. v. Shardindu
- Raja Ram Pal v. The Honble Speaker, Lok Sabha & Ors.
- Sathi Vijay Kumar v. Tota Singh and Ors.
- Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India and Ors.
- Rameshwar Prasad and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
- Manda Jaganath v. K.S. Rathnam and Ors.
- Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma
- U.P. Public Services Commission v. Subhash Chandra Dixit and Ors.
- P.T Rajan v. T.P.M. Sahir and Ors.
- People'S Union for Civil Liberties (Pucl) and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
- Shaligram Shrivastava v. Naresh Singh Patel
- Charan Lal Sahu v. Dr. Apj Abdul Kalam and Ors.
- Special Reference No. I of 2002 v. .
- Indian National Congress (I) v. Institute of Social Welfare and Ors.
- Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms and Anr.
- P.H Pujar v. Kanthi Rajashekhar Kidiyappa and Ors.
- Michael B. Fernandes v. C.K. Jaffer Sharief and Ors .
- Election Commission of India Through Secretary v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
- Election Commission of India and Anr. v. Dr. Manmohan Singh and Ors.
- Krishna Mohini v. Mohinder Nath Sofat
- Sri Uma Ballav Rath v. Sri Maheshwar Mohanty and Ors.
- P.V. Narasimha Rao Etc. Etc. v. State (Cbl/Spe) Etc. Etc.
- Election Commission of India v. Dr. Subramanian Swamy and Anr.
- Bhim Singh, President Jammu and Kashmir Panthers Party v. The Election Commissioner of India and Anr.
- Common Cause-A Registered Society v. Union of India & Ors.
- Janata Dal (Samajwadi) v. The Election Commissioner of India
- T.N. Seshan, Chief Election Commissioner of India Etc. v. Union of India and Others
- Election Commission of India v. State Bank of India Staff Association Local Head Office Unit, Patna and Ors. Etc.
- Lal Babu Hussein and Ors. v. Electoral Registration Officer and Ors.
- Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. v. Union of India
- Digvijay Mote v. Union of India and Ors.
- K. Veeraswami v. Union of India and Others
- S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India and Ors.
- Smt. Lata Devi (Mali) v. Haru Rajwar
- Election Commission of India v. Shivaji & Ors.
- Dev Singh & Ors. v. Registrar, Punjab & Haryana High Court & Ors.
- Bhagwati Prasad Dixit 'Ghorewala' v. Rajeev Gandhi
- Umaji Keshao Meshram & Ors. v. Radhikabai W/O Anandrao Banapurkar & Anr.
- Indrajit Barija & Ors. Etc. v. Election Commlssion of India & Ors.
- Kanhiyalal Omar v. R.K. Trivedi & Ors.
- A.C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai & Ors.
- Roop Lal Singh v. Nachhattar Singh
- Lakshmi Charan Sen and Ors Etc. v. A.K.M. Hassan Uzzaman Amo Ors. Etc.
- Jyoti Basu & Others. v. Debi Ghosal & Others.
- Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India
- Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi & Ors.
- All Party Hill Leaders' Conference, Shillong v. Captain M.A. Sangma & Ors.
- Hukumdev Narain Yadav v. Lalit Narain Mishra