Constitution of India · Part III: Fundamental Rights · Saving of Certain Laws
Article 31A: Saving of Laws providing for acquisition of estates, etc
In plain words
Certain laws cannot be struck down for violating articles 14 or 19. These are laws for acquiring estates or rights in them, temporary State management of property, merging corporations, changing the rights of company managers, directors or shareholders, or changing mining leases.
- A State law gets this protection only if it has received the President's assent.
- Land within the ceiling limit under a person's personal cultivation cannot be acquired unless compensation at least equal to market value is paid.
- "Estate" includes jagirs, inams and similar grants, ryotwari land, and agricultural land.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
[(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights; or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property; or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations; or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof; or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence, shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by [article 14 or article 19]:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:] [Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.]
(2) In this article,— [(a) the expression “estate” shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of [Tamil Nadu] and [Keralam], any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;]
(b) the expression “rights”, in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, sub-proprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, [raiyat, under-raiyat] or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 31A
-
The State of Haryana v. Jai Singh and Others
The issue pertains to assail the correctness of the Judgment and Order passed by the Full Bench of High Court wherein the writ petition preferred by the proprietors/landowners, (Respondents herein), challenging the…
-
The State of Tamil Nadu v. The Governor of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
a. What courses of action are available to the Governor in exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution. b. Whether the Governor can reserve a Bill for the consideration of the President when it is…
-
Yerikala Sunkalamma & Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue & Ors.
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellants were held to be the lawful owners of the ‘Patta Land’.
-
involved and in I.R. Coelho v. State of T.N. [(1999) 7
(1) Whether Article 31C (as upheld in Kesavananda Bharati case) survives in the Constitution after amendment to the provision by the forty-second amendment was struck down by the Supreme Court in Minerva Mills case; and…
-
Industries Ltd. v. Union of India [2000] Supp. 4 SCR 44 : (2001) 1
The questions which arose for determination are as to what is the true nature of royalty determined u/s.9 r/w s.15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; whether royalty is in the nature of…
-
Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Judgment and order under review ignored the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in Bhagat Ram & others vs. State of Punjab & others which had a direct bearing on the issue in question and took a view totally…
- In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution v. .
-
Lajja Ram & Ors. v. Rati Chand & Ors. Etc
Nature and extent of a bhondedar’ s right over a shamlatdeh property (land reserved & used for common purpose in villages) and whether the bhondedar can exercise ownership rights over the granted land. Customary…
- Loonkaran Gandhi (D) Thr. Lr. v. State of
-
Yadaiah and Anr. v. State of Telangana and
In the instant appeal, the resumption order concerning the assignment of non-occupied land in the 1960s to la ndless scheduled caste/scheduled tribe persons for the purpose of cultivation which was upheld by the…
- Association of Vasanth Apartments’ Owners v. V. Gopinath & Ors
- Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India
- M/S Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr
- National Highways Authority of India v. Sri P. Nagaraju @ Cheluvaiah & Anr
- Union of India & Ors v. M/S. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
- The State of Haryana Through Secretary to Government of Haryana v. Jai Singh & Ors.
- State of Andhra Pradesh (Now State of Telangana) v. A. P. State Wakf Board & Ors.
- Union of India v. Rajendra N. Shah and Another
- Forum for People’S Collective Efforts (Fpce) & Anr. v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr.
- Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule v. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Limited
- Vasant Ganpat Padave (D) by Lrs. & Ors . v. Anant Mahadev Sawant (D) Through Lrs. & Ors
- Moons Technologies Ltd. (Formerly Known As Financial Technologies India Ltd.) & Ors. v. Union of India
- Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam v. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors.
- Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare v. Indore Municipal Corporation & Ors.
- Jindal Stainless Ltd. & Anr v. State of Haryana & Ors
- N.K. Rajendra Mohan v. Thirvamadi Rubber Co. Ltd. & Ors.
- Rajasthan Housing Board v. New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. & Anr.
- Bhimandas Ambwani (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Delhi Power Company Limited & Ors.
- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsinghpur v. M/S. Shiv Shakti Khansari Udyog and Others
- Society for Un-Aided P.School of Rajasthan v. U.O.I. & Anr.
- M/S. Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Rajiv Sarin & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
- K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. State of Karnataka
- Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- K.K. Poonacha v. State of Karnataka and Others
- State of Kerala and Another v. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala State Unit and Others
- Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation v. Shahal Hassan Mussaliar & Anr.
- Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Ors
- Karnataka Bank Ltd. v. State of A.P. & Ors.
- I. R. Coelho (Dead) by Lrs. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Basant Nahata
- Govt. of A.P. and Ors. v. Kollutla Obi Reddy and Ors.
- State of West Bengal v. Ashish Kumar Roy and Ors.
- Kaiser-I-Hind Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Ltd. and Ors.
- State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. v. Nallamilli Rami Reddi and Ors.
- Union of India v. Elplllnstone Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. & Ors. Etc.
- State of U.P. v. The Upper Jamuna Valley Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- Shish Ram and Ors. v. The State of Haryana and Ors.
- Murari and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Tamil Nadu v. M/S. Arooran Sugars Ltd.
- Karnal Improvement Trust, Karnal v. Smt. Parkash Wanti (Dead) and Anr.
- Kanwar Lal v. Iind Additional Distt. Judge, Nainital and Ors.
- Sri Bagawati Tea Estates Ltd. v. Government of India and Ors.
- Cochin Devaswam Board v. Captain E.M. George and Ors.
- State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. Ananthi Ammal and Ors.
- P.N. Krishna Lal and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Govt. of Kerala and Anr. Etc. Etc.
- K.S. P Aripoornan v. State of Kerala and Others
- Sh. Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar Etc Etc. v. State of Gujarat and Anr. Etc. Etc.
- Yogendra Pal and Others v. Municipality, Bhatinda and Anr.
- Srinivasa Coop. House Building Society Ltd. v. Madam Gurumurthy Sastry and Ors.
- Ram Chand and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu and Others
- Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu and Anr. v. Lakshmibai Narayan Patil Etc. Etc.
- State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Kamlaben Jivabhai & Ors.
- Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam and Ors.
- Gopal Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- K.I. Shephard & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
- H.S. Srinivasa Raghavachar Etc. Etc. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Maharaj Dhiraj Himmatsinghji & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
- Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
- S. Thenappa Chettiar Etc. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Satyavir Singh and Others v. Union of India and Others. Etc. Etc.
- Union of India and Another v. Tulsiram Patel and Others
- Gram Panchayat of Village, Jamalpur v. Malwinder Singh & Ors.
- Daman Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- Ram Nath & Ors. v. Union of India
- Manchegowda Etc. v. State of Karnataka Etc.
- Begulla Bapi Raju Etc. Etc. v. State of Andhra Pradesh Etc. Etc.
- Prem Nath Raina and Others v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Others
- State of Mysore Etc. v. M. L. Nagade and Gadag & Ors.
- S.P. Mittal Etc. Etc. v. Union of India and Others
- Maharao Sahib Sri Bhim Singhji Etc. Etc v. Union of India and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Waman Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors v. Union of India & Ors.
- Seth Nand Lal & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Ambika Prasad Mishra Etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc.
- Tumati Venkaish Etc. Etc. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Sasanka Sekhar Maity & Ors. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Tara Prasad Singh Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Others
- Union of India Etc. v. Valluri Basavaiah Chaudhary Etc. Etc.
- Prag Ice & Oil Mills & Anr. Etc v. Union of India
- State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Man Singh Surat Singh Padvi & Ors,
- State of Karnataka and Anr Etc. v. Shri Ranganatha Reddy & Anr. Etc.
- Dattatraya Govind Mahajan & Ors. Etc. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Hasmukhalal Dahayabhai & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. State of Gujarat
- Achutananda Purohit and Ors. v. The State of Orissa
- State of Haryana & Anr. v. Chanan Mal Etc.
- Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Shri Raj Narain
- Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. S. B. Kamble and Ors.