Constitution of India · Part V: The Union · Procedure Generally
Article 119: Regulation by law of procedure in Parliament in relation to financial business
In plain words
To complete financial business on time, Parliament can by law regulate how each House handles financial matters and Appropriation Bills. Such a law prevails over any inconsistent rule of either House.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Parliament may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, each House of Parliament in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by a House of Parliament under clause (1) of article 118 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to Parliament under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 119
- Kalpana Mehta and Others v. Union of India and Others
- State of Karnataka v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- Raja Ram Pal v. The Honble Speaker, Lok Sabha & Ors.
- Sub-Commitiee on Judicial Accountability Etc. Etc. v. Union of India and Ors., Etc.
- I. C. Golak Nath & Ors. v. Sta Te of Punjab & Anrs.
- The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt.
- In Re the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-Merwara (Extension of Laws) Act, 1947 and the Part C States (Laws) Act, 1950 v. Reference Case