Constitution of India · Part V: The Union · Disqualifications of Members
Article 101: Vacation of seats
(1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State ***, and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of [a State], then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person’s seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament—
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in [clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102]; or [(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be,] his seat shall thereupon become vacant: [Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.]
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days. See the Prohibition of Simultaneous Membership Rules, 1950, published with the
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 101
-
Afjal Ansari v. State of UP
What are the parameters to be considered for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; and whether conviction…
- Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil v. Hon’Ble Speaker, Karnataka Legislative Assembly and Others
- Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary S.N. Shukla v. Election Commission of India & Ors.
- Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
- Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Anr.
- Pramod Laxman Gudadhe v. Election Commission of India and Ors.
- Election Commission of India v. Bajrang Bahadur Singh & Ors.
- Manoj Narula v. Union of India
- Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar & Ors.
- Lily Thomas v. Union of India & Ors.
- Amarinder Singh v. Special Commitiee, Punjab Vidhan ,Sabha & Others
- Consumer Education & Research Society v. Union of India & Ors.
- Raja Ram Pal v. The Honble Speaker, Lok Sabha & Ors.
- Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India and Ors.
- P.V. Narasimha Rao Etc. Etc. v. State (Cbl/Spe) Etc. Etc.
- State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. v. Kailash Chand Mahajan and Ors.