Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXV: Irregular Proceedings
Section 460: Irregularities which do not vitiate proceedings
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
If any Magistrate not empowered by law to do any of the following things, namely:—
(a) to issue a search-warrant under section 94; 1. Subs. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 41, for —less than ten rupees‖ (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
(b) to order, under section 155, the police to investigate an offence;
(c) to hold an inquest under section 176;
(d) to issue process under section 187, for the apprehension of a person within his local jurisdiction who has committed an offence outside the limits of such jurisdiction;
(e) to take cognizance of an offence under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 190;
(f) to make over a case under sub-section (2) of section 192;
(g) to tender a pardon under section 306;
(h) to recall a case and try it himself under section 410; or
(i) to sell property under section 458 or section 459, erroneously in good faith does that thing, his proceedings shall not be set aside merely on the ground of his not being so empowered.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 460
- Jigar @ Jimmy Pravinchandra Adatiya v. State of Gujarat
- Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
- Shantaben Bhurabhai Bhuriya v. Anand Athabhai Chaudhari & Ors.
- M/S Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
- State Through Cbi, Chennai v. V. Arul Kumar
- P.C. Mishra v. State (C.B.I.) & Anr.
- State of Hlmachal Pradesh v. Surinder Mohan and Ors.