Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXIV: Disposal of Property
Section 457: Procedure by police upon seizure of property
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
When police report a seizure of property that is not produced in an inquiry or trial, the Magistrate can order its disposal or delivery to the person entitled. If that person is unknown, the Magistrate can keep it and issue a proclamation asking claimants to establish their claim within six months.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Whenever the seizure of property by any police officer is reported to a Magistrate under the provisions of this Code, and such property is not produced before a Criminal Court during an inquiry or trial, the Magistrate may make such order as he thinks fit respecting the disposal of such property or the delivery of such property to the person entitled to the possession thereof, or if such person cannot be ascertained, respecting the custody and production of such property.
(2) If the person so entitled is known, the Magistrate may order the property to be delivered to him on such conditions (if any) as the Magistrate thinks fit and if such person is unknown, the Magistrate may detain it and shall, in such case, issue a proclamation specifying the articles of which such property consists, and requiring any person who may have a claim thereto, to appear before him and establish his claim within six months from the date of such proclamation.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 457
-
Kathyayini v. Sidharth P.S. Reddy & Ors.
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against respondent nos.1 and 2 in two complaint cases whereby they were charged for offences punishable u/ss.120B, 415, 420 r/w. s.34 of Penal Code, 1860. Whether a prima…
-
Bishwajit Dey v. The State of Assam
Interim release of conveyances during the pendency of the trial in NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985) cases.
-
Gaurav Maini v. The State of Haryana
Courts below, if justified in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offences punishable u/ss. 364A, 392 and 120B IPC.
-
Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen & Ors.
What is the implication of non-reporting of the seizure forthwith to the jurisdictional Magistrate as provided under Section 102(3) Cr.P.C.; does delayed reporting of the seizure to the Magistrate vitiate the seizure…
- Pankaj Akshan v. State & Ors
- Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Gaushala v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)
- The State of Karnataka & Ors. v. M/S. Vedanta Limited (Formerly Known As Sesa Sterlite Limited) & Ors.
- State Through CBI New Delhi v. Jitender Kumar Singh
- State of Bihar & Anr. v. Arvind Kumar & Anr.
- M.T. Enrica Lexie & Anr. v. Doramma & Ors.
- Bharat Amratlal Kothari and Another v. Dosukhan Samadkhan Sindhi and Ors.
- State of Kerala v. C.A. Jabbar
- Oma Ram v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- Bharath Metha v. State by Inspector of Police Chennai
- State of U.P. and Anr. v. Lalloo Singh
- S. Chinnasamy and Anr. v. Seed Inspector, Coimbatore and Anr.
- Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat
- State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy
- Ram Parkash Sharma v. State of Haryana