Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXXII: Execution, Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences · E.–Suspension, remission and commutation of sentences
Section 435: State Government to act after consultation with Central Government in certain cases
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
The State Government can remit or commute a sentence only after consulting the Central Government where the offence was investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment or another central agency, involved Central Government property, or was committed by a Central Government servant in official duty.
- Where a person has concurrent sentences, some for Union matters, a State order has no effect unless the Central Government makes a matching order for those offences.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The powers conferred by sections 432 and 433 upon the State Government to remit or commute a sentence, in any case where the sentence is for an offence—
(a) which was investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment constituted under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), or by any other agency empowered to make investigation into an offence under any Central Act other than this Code, or
(b) which involved the misappropriation or destruction of, or damage to, any property belonging to the 1. Ins. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 32 (w.e.f.18-12-1978).
Central Government, or
(c) which was committed by a person in the service of the Central Government while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, shall not be exercised by the State Government except after consultation with the Central Government.
(2) No order of suspension, remission or commutation of sentences passed by the State Government in relation to a person, who has been convicted of offences, some of which relate to matters to which the executive power of the Union extends, and who has been sentenced to separate terms of imprisonment which are to run concurrently, shall have effect unless an order for the suspension, remission or commutation, as the case may be, of such sentences has also been made by the Central Government in relation to the offences committed by such person with regard to matters to which the executive power of the Union extends.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 435
-
Sachin v. State of Maharashtra
Issue arose whether, the High Court could enhance the sentence under its revisional powers in a convict’s appeal against conviction.
-
Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others
Writ petition filed u/Art. 32 by one of the victims challenging the order of State of Gujarat granting remission and early release of 11 convicts held guilty in Bilkis Bano matter, if maintainable; writ petitions filed…
- A.G. Perarivalan v. State, Through Superintendent of Police Cbi/Sit/ Mmda, Chennai, Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- Vinod Dua v. Union of India & Ors.
- Life Insurance Corporation of v. Nandini J. Shah & Ors
- Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
- Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
- Mahmadhusen Abdulrahim Kalota Shaikh v. Union of India & Ors.
- Firm Ramdeo Onkarmal & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Chandrasekhar Singh & Ors. v. Siya Ram Singh & Ors.
- Sunil Batra Etc. v. Delhi Administration and Ors. Etc.
- Thakur Das (Dead) by L. Rs v. State of Madhya Pradesh