Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXVI: Provisions As to Offences Affecting the Administration of Justice
Section 340: Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of Justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that Court, such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,—
(a) record a finding to that effect;
(b) make a complaint thereof in writing;
(c) send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction;
(d) take sufficient security for the appearance of the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the Court thinks it necessary so to do, send the accused in custody to such Magistrate; and
(e) bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate.
(2) The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195.
(3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed,—
(a) where the Court making the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the Court as the Court may appoint;
[(b) in any other case, by the presiding officer of the Court or by such officer of the Court as the Court may authorise in writing in this behalf.]
(4) In this section, "Court" has the same meaning as in section 195.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 340
-
Devendra Kumar v. The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
High Court affirmed the order passed by the CMM directing registration of the FIR against the petitioner for offences punishable u/ss.186 and 341, Penal Code, 1860. Whether the CMM erred in involving the police in a…
-
Vikram Bakshi and Others v. R.P. Khosla and Another
Whether a review or recall of an order passed in a criminal proceeding initiated under section 340 of CrPC is permissible or not.
-
Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
I. Whether the Supreme Court decisions in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (I) and (II), which lay down the guidelines for the designation of senior advocates, require reconsideration. II. Whether an advocate on…
-
Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda
Issue arose whether the petitioner-wife is entitled to the transfer of the divorce petition; and whether this Court, upon the application filed by the respondent-husband, can exercise its powers u/Art. 142(1) of the…
-
Ajwar v. Waseem and Another
High Court, if justified in exercising jurisdiction u/s. 439(1) Cr.P.C for granting regular bail in favour of the accused persons.
-
Kuldeep Kumar v. U.T. Chandigarh and Others
Result of the election to the post of Mayor at the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation declared by the Presiding Officer in favour of the eighth respondent, if was contrary to law in view of the alleged electoral…
- Aditi Alias Mithi v. Jitesh Sharma
- Bhim Rao Baswanth Rao Patil v. K. Madan Mohan
- Ashok Gulabrao Bondre v. Vilas Madhukarrao
- P. Dharamaraj v. Shanmugam & Ors.
- Himanshu Kumar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
- N.S. Nandiesha Reddy v. Kavitha Mahesh
- Bhima Razu Prasad v. State, Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbi/Spe/Acu-Ii
- Priti Saraf & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
- Rajendra Khare v. Swaati Nirkhi and Ors.
- Rajnesh v. Neha & Anr.
- Shri Ram Sahu (Dead) Through Lrs. v. Vinod Kumar Rawat & Ors.
- Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- M/S Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc
- Sarika v. Administrator, Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain (M.P.) & Ors.
- Re : Vijay Kurle & Ors. v. Re:
- Chandeshwar Saw v. Brij Bhushan Prasad & Ors.
- Yashwant Sinha & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Director & Anr.
- Ram Parshotam Mittal & Ors. v. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- Sasikala Pushpa and Others v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Hari Steel and General Industries Ltd. & Anr. v. Daljit Singh & Ors.
- Aarish Asgar Qureshi v. Fareed Ahmed Qureshi & Anr.
- Sh. Narendra Kumar Srivastava v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
- Mahender Chawla & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Pankaj Chaudhary and Ors.
- Uttaradi Mutt v. Raghavendra Swamy Mutt
- Vishnu Chandru Gaonkar v. N.M. Dessai
- Amit Vashistha v. Suresh and Another
- State of Goa v. Jose Maria Albert Vales @ Robert Vales
- Maharaji Educational Trust v. Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
- Ayan Chatterjee v. Future Technology Foundation Inc. & Ors.
- Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Cricket Association of Bihar & Ors.
- Amarsang Nathaji As Himself and As Karta and Manager v. Hardik Harshadbhai Patel and Others
- Anita Kushwaha v. Pushap Sudan
- M/S. v. L. S. Finance Ltd. v. S. P. Gupta and Anr.
- Prem Sagar Manocha v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Raziaamirali Shroff and Others v. M/S Nishuvi Corporation and Others
- George Bhaktan v. Rabindra Lele & Ors.
- Mr. Vikram Bakshi & Ors. v. Ms. Sonia Khosla (Dead) by Lrs.
- Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Director, Centeral Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Vishal Agrawal & Anr. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board & Anr.
- Perumal v. Janaki
- Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
- C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal
- Kishorebhai Gandubhai Pethani v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. & Ors.
- Ram Dhan v. State of U.P. and Anr.
- Iqbal Singh Narang & Ors. v. Veeran Narang
- Abdul Rehman & Ors. v. K.M. Anees-Ul-Haq
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr.
- Dinbandhu v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- Rameshwari Devi & Ors. v. Nirmala Devi & Ors.
- Narmada Bachao Andolan v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
- Md. Sukur Ali v. State of Assam
- The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Vimal Kumar Surana and Another
- R.S. Sujatha v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
- Van Vibhag Karamchari Griha Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit (Regd.) v. Ramesh Chander and Ors.
- M/S. Kapil Corepacks Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Shri Harbans Lal (Since Deceased) Through Lrs.